Table 1. Results of participants of the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016 challenge with the result published by Haenssle et al.
| Average Precision | Accuracy | AUC ROC | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our approach | 0.709 | 0.839 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.908 |
| Rank 1 | 0.637 | 0.855 | 0.804 | 0.507 | 0.941 |
| Rank 2 | 0.619 | 0.813 | 0.802 | 0.573 | 0.872 |
| Rank 3 | 0.598 | 0.834 | 0.826 | 0.32 | 0.961 |
| Rank 4 | 0.563 | 0.786 | 0.796 | 0.667 | 0.816 |
| Rank 5 | 0.559 | 0.844 | 0.775 | 0.24 | 0.993 |
| Haenssle et al. | not listed | not listed | 0.79 | not listed | not listed |