Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 18;10:1335. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01335

Table 5.

The mean of bacterial relative abundance of main genera belonging to the family Comamonadaceae (%).

GENUS CC2TRt Z958TRt CC2TRh Z958TRh CC2TSS Z958TSS CC2FRt Z958FRt CC2FRh Z958FRh CC2FSS Z958FSS
Rubrivivax 1.06 0.71 0.83 0.89 0.52 0.52 1.11 0.89 0.68 0.66 0.53 0.46
Methylibium 1.68 0.51 0.52 0.46 0.14 0.18 0.60 0.53 0.21 0.22 0.13 0.10
Comamonas 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Hydrogenophaga 0.05 0.11 0.03 0.15 0.02 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01
Ramlibacter 0.24 0.19 0.65 0.41 0.57 0.78 0.80 0.60 0.70 0.57 0.41 0.33
Variovorax 0.29 0.53 0.36 0.33 0.14 0.12 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Polaromonas 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Pelomonas 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.03 0.01
Inhella 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
Hylemonella 0.11 0.12 0.26 0.20 0.17 0.22 0.23 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.17
Roseateles 3.38 1.40 0.58 0.24 0.21 0.20 6.59 2.76 1.03 0.37 0.10 0.07
Acidovorax 10.47 2.77 1.49 1.01 0.45 0.18 1.30 0.59 0.44 0.28 0.07 0.04

Those relative abundances with bold letters show significant difference between CC2 and Z958 calculated by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. Treatment's details were as in Table 1.