Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;9:9139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45579-0

Table 3.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis for overall survival of AML patients.

Data set/cohort Variable 4-GES L-24 M-7 W-3
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
GSE12417/1 GE score, high vs. low 3.8 2.3–6.2 8.8 * 10−08 2.25 1.5–3.4 7.5 * 10−05 na Na na 1.51 1.07–2.14 0.021
Age (years) 1.02 1.0–1.0 0.006 1.03 1.0–1.04 0.0003 na Na na 1.03 1.01–1.04 0.0004
GSE12417/2 GE score, high vs. low 4.58 1.1–18.9 0.035 ns ns ns 2.68 1.5–4.9 0.0016 2.01 1.1–3.7 0.022
Age (years) 1.04 1.0–1.1 0.008 ns ns ns 1.03 1.0–1.06 0.0063 1.03 1.0–1.1 0.0079
GSE6891/1 GE score, high vs. low 1.69 1.2–2.5 0.008 1.1 0.8–1.6 0.56 2.0 1.4–2.8 5.3 * 10−05 ns ns ns
Cytogenetic riska 1.91 1.5–2.5 1.4 * 10−06 1.97 1.5–2.6 3.7 * 10−07 1.98 1.6–2.5 2.9 * 10−08 ns ns ns
CEBPAm (w/m/b) 0.79 0.1–6.4 0.828 0.84 0.1–8.1 0.878 0.95 0.1–6.4 0.957 ns ns ns
CEBPAm (yes/no) 0.94 0.0–57.1 0.976 0.71 0.0–61.2 0.878 0.66 0.01–27.5 0.83 ns ns ns
EVI1 expression (+/−) 0.82 0.5–1.5 0.511 0.95 0.5–1.7 0.854 0.89 0.5–1.6 0.681 ns ns ns
FLT3-ITD 1.38 0.9–2.0 0.106 1.69 1.2–2.5 0.006 1.82 1.3–2.6 0.0008 ns ns ns
GSE6891/2 GE score, high vs. low 2.24 1.5–3.4 0.0001 1.33 0.9–2.0 0.173 1.7 1.1–2.5 0.0086 ns ns ns
Age (years) 1.01 1.0–1.03 0.281 1.01 1.0–1.03 0.128 1.01 1.0–1.03 0.102 ns ns ns
Cytogenetic riska 1.13 0.8–1.6 0.528 1.22 0.9–1.75 0.27 1.35 1.0–1.92 0.092 ns ns ns
EVI1 expression (+/−) 3.73 1.8–7.6 0.0002 2.95 1.5–6.0 0.0025 2.9 1.4–5.8 0.0028 ns ns ns
GSE37642 GE score, high vs. low 2.13 1.6–2.8 1.8 * 10−07 1.49 1.2–1.9 0.0016 na Na na ns ns ns
Age (years) 1.03 1.0–1.04 5.6 * 10−12 1.03 1.0–1.04 1.5 * 10−13 na Na na ns ns ns
ELN scoreb 1.26 1.1–1.4 7.1 * 10−05 1.33 1.2–1.5 4.1 * 10−07 na Na na ns ns ns
FAB, M1 vs. others 1.06 0.8–1.4 0.718 0.95 0.7–1.3 0.745 na Na na ns ns ns
FAB, M4 vs. others 1.32 1.0–1.8 0.074 1.45 1.1–2.0 0.017 na Na na ns ns ns
TCGA_LAML GE score, high vs. low 1.52 1.0–2.3 0.051 1.3 0.8–2.1 0.249 ns Ns ns 2.45 1.4–4.3 0.002
Age (years) 1.03 1.0–1.1 0.00013 1.03 1.0–1.1 8.8 * 10−05 ns Ns ns 1.04 1.0–1.1 2.3 * 10−05
Cytogenetic riska 1.29 0.9–1.9 0.179 1.25 0.8–1.9 0.265 ns Ns ns 1.49 1.0–2.1 0.033

Parameters provided with the respective data sets were first tested in univariable analyses (Supplementary Table S1); those that resulted as significant were included in the multivariable models, whose results are summarized in this table. 4-GES, 4-gene expression score; L-24, 24-gene expression signature by Li et al.16; M-7, 7-gene expression signature by Marcucci et al.19; W-3, 3-gene expression signature by Wilop et al.20; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; GE score, gene expression score; CEBPAm, CEBPA mutation; w, wild type; m, monoallelic; b, biallelic. aAssignment to cytogenetic risk groups were included in the respective GEO entries. bAssignment to ELN risk groups was provided by T. Herold, University of Munich, Department of Internal Medicine III, Munich, Germany. No relevant patient data were provided in GSE71014; therefore, multivariable analyses could not be performed. Significant p-values and corresponding HRs and Cis are indicated in bold letters. na, score could not be calculated because 2 signature genes were not represented on HG-U133A microarrays; ns, no statistical significance found in univariable analyses, thus, no multivariable analyses were performed.