Table 2.
Results from the applied logistic regression evaluating NAFLD, according to D-AII, for the baseline ATTICA participants.
| All participants | Odds ratios (95% confidence
intervals) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NAFLD
by TyG cutoff |
NAFLD
by HSI cutoff |
NAFLD
by FLI cutoff |
NAFLD
by NAFLD-FLS cutoff |
|
| Age (years) | 1.004 (0.99–1.02) |
1.02 (0.99–1.04) |
1.01 (0.99–1.04) |
1.005 (0.98–1.03) |
| Men versus women | 1.06 (0.77–1.48) |
1.87 (0.13–3.09) |
1.58 (0.89–2.78) |
1.42 (0.86–2.36) |
| Education (years of school) | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) |
1.02 (0.93–1.12) |
1.02 (0.92–1.13) |
0.96 (0.88–1.05) |
| SES (low/middle versus high) | 1.09 (0.73–1.6) |
1.08 (0.55–2.14) |
1.29 (0.60–2.79) |
1.73 (0.87–3.45) |
| Alcohol intake (y/n) | 0.83 (0.62–1.12) |
1.18 (0.70–1.99) |
1.06 (0.59–1.90) |
1.68 (0.96–2.94) |
| Smoking ever (y/n) | 0.75 (0.56–0.98) |
0.83 (0.52–1.31) |
1.21 (0.71–2.08) |
0.74 (0.47–1.18) |
| Physically active (y/n) | 0.98 (0.96–1.06) |
0.68 (0.42–1.09) |
1.23 (0.73–2.09) |
0.92 (0.57–1.48) |
| Obesity, % yes | 1.34 (0.97–1.86) |
1.40 (0.85–2.31) |
1.07 (0.63–1.83) |
1.87 (0.14–3.07) |
| Hypertension (y/n) | 0.71 (0.52–0.96) |
0.49 (0.29–0.82) |
1.06 (0.61–1.83) |
1.02 (0.62–1.67) |
| Diabetes mellitus (y/n) | 0.95 (0.53–1.69) |
0.52 (0.16–1.66) |
0.89 (0.28–2.86) |
0.42 (0.13–1.39) |
| Hypercholesterolemia (y/n) | 1.20 (0.90–1.60) |
0.80 (0.50–1.29) |
1.07 (0.63–1.82) |
1.05 (0.65–1.68) |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 3.04 (0.70–13.28) |
1.88 (0.27–13.02) |
2.03 (0.27–15.05) |
1.25 (0.19–8.08) |
| D-AII (10–77) | 0.95 (0.93–0.98) |
0.89 (0.86–0.92) |
0.88 (0.85–0.91) |
0.89 (0.86–0.92) |
D-AII, Dietary Anti-Inflammation Index; FLI, fatty liver index; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; FLS, Fatty Liver Score; SES, socioeconomic status; TyG, triglyceride-glucose.