Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Hypertens. 2018 Nov 12;33(3):229–236. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0129-z

Table 3.

Relationship between VIM of average BP across four study visits and various characteristics among participants without antihypertensive treatment or past history of CVD: INTERMAP, 1996–1999

VIM of average BP
Model 1 Model 3
Beta P-value Beta P-value
Age (5 years) 0.231 <0.001 0.229 <0.001
Women 0.631 <0.001 0.589 <0.001
Country
 Japan Reference Reference
 PRC 1.225 <0.001 1.276 <0.001
 UK −0.024 0.931 −0.025 0.931
 US 0.235 0.392 0.262 0.365
BMI (kg/sq.m) −0.038 0.001 −0.031 0.008
Pulse (10 beats/min) −0.145 0.008 −0.122 0.029
Smoking
 Non-smoker Reference
 Ex-smoker −0.003 0.985
 Smoker 0.075 0.548
Drinking
 Non-drinker Reference
 Ex-drinker −0.354 0.085
 Moderate drinker −0.185 0.218
 Heavy drinker −0.327 0.125
Mean inside temperature (°C) 0.003 0.919
Mean outside temperature (°C) 0.015 0.039 0.014 0.062
Physical activity (h/week)a 0.018 0.249
Years of education
 6 years or less Reference
 12 years or less 0.025 0.909
 More than 13 years 0.174 0.496
Family history of hypertension −0.003 0.972
Urinary sodium (20 mmol/24 h) −0.035 0.031 −0.022 0.192
Urinary potassium (10 mmol/24 h) −0.036 0.203

The associations between VIMs of BP and participant characteristics were assessed using multiple linear regression analysis

BP blood pressure, VIM variation independent of mean, CVD cardiovascular disease, BMI body mass index, PRC People’s Republic of China, UK United Kingdom, US United States, h hour

a

Physical activity was defined as number of hours with moderate and heavy physical activity per week. Model 1 included age, sex, countries and study centers. Model 3 included age, sex, countries, study centers and all variables associated with VIM of visit-to-visit BP variability (P 0.05) in Model 1