Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Jan 10;36(4):1764.e9–1764.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.032

The distinct genetic pattern of ALS in Turkey and novel mutations

Aslıhan Özoguz a, Özgün Uyan a, Güneş Birdal a, Ceren Iskender a, Ece Kartal a, Suna Lahut a, Özgür Ömür a, Zeynep Sena Agim a, Aslı Gündogdu Eken a, Nesli Ece Sen a, Pınar Kavak b, Ceren Saygı a, Peter C Sapp c, Pamela Keagle c, Yeşim Parman d, Ersin Tan e, Filiz Koç f, Feza Deymeer d, Piraye Oflazer d, Haşmet Hanağası d, Hakan Gürvit d, Başar Bilgiç d, Hacer Durmuş d, Mustafa Ertaş g, Dilcan Kotan h, Mehmet Ali Akalın i, Halil Güllüoğlu j, Mehmet Zarifoğlu k, Fikret Aysal l, Nilgün Döşoğlu m, Kaya Bilguvar n, Murat Günel n, Özlem Keskin o, Tahsin Akgün p, Hilmi Özçelik q, John E Landers c, Robert H Brown c, A Nazlı Başak a,*
PMCID: PMC6591733  NIHMSID: NIHMS1034269  PMID: 25681989

Abstract

The frequency of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) mutations has been extensively investigated in several populations; however, a systematic analysis in Turkish cases has not been reported so far. In this study, we screened 477 ALS patients for mutations, including 116 familial ALS patients from 82 families and 361 sporadic ALS (sALS) cases. Patients were genotyped for C9orf72 (18.3%), SOD1 (12.2%), FUS (5%), TARDBP (3.7%), and UBQLN2 (2.4%) gene mutations, which together account for approximately 40% of familial ALS in Turkey. No SOD1 mutations were detected in sALS patients; however, C9orf72 (3.1%) and UBQLN2 (0.6%) explained 3.7% of sALS in the population. Exome sequencing revealed mutations in OPTN, SPG11, DJ1, PLEKHG5, SYNE1, TRPM7, and SQSTM1 genes, many of them novel. The spectrum of mutations reflect both the distinct genetic background and the heterogeneous nature of the Turkish ALS population.

Keywords: ALS, Turkey, SOD1, C9orf72, TDP-43, FUS

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the selective death of motor neurons in the motor cortex, brainstem, and spinal cord. ALS is rapidly progressive, leading to death in 2–5 years after diagnosis. (Pasinelli and Brown, 2006). Today, the disease is mostly described as a multisystem disorder in which many different systems, including the nonmotor areas, are eventually affected (Ferraiuolo et al., 2011). ALS has a fairly uniform incidence throughout the world (2–3/100,000). Approximately, 5%−10% of ALS cases are familial ALS (fALS) and the rest sporadic ALS (sALS). fALS and sALS are almost indistinguishable in terms of clinical features. Because interestingly many fALS mutations have also recently been observed in sALS, genetic studies of fALS cases are expected to be informative in understanding the mechanisms, leading to sALS. Currently, the most common genes, which give rise to fALS when mutated, are the dynamic hexanucleotide expansion in chromosome 9 (C9orf72), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR-DNA-binding protein (TARDBP), fused in sarcoma (FUS), and ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2) (Andersen and Al-Chalabi, 2011; Ticozzi et al., 2011). Mutations in all other fALS genes, like alsin (ALS2), senataxin (SETX), dynactin 1 (DCTN1), angiogenin (ANG), optineurin (OPTN), and spatacsin (SPG11), are relatively rare (Al-Chalabi et al., 2012).

Turkey is a large country with a high birth rate and consanguineous marriages (mostly between the first cousins) are rather the rule than the exception in the eastern parts of the country. Being at the crossroad of 2 continents and different civilizations, Turkey with its rich and ancient history is known to be ethnically very heterogeneous. In recent years, several population-based ALS studies have been conducted in different ethnic groups. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report compiling the genetic basis of ALS inTurkey. In the framework of this study, we analyzed a cohort of 477 patients, using conventional methods and next generation technologies, to define the spectrum of ALS mutations in Turkey.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

This study includes a total of 477 Turkish ALS patients, who were referred to our center from the neurology departments of several hospitals throughout Turkey. El Escorial criteria were applied for clinical diagnosis (Brooks et al., 2000). From 477 patients, 443 (273 males and 170 females) were unrelated and thus included into the calculation of mutation frequencies. Out of443,82 were familial (18%) and 361 (82%) isolated cases. In most isolated cases, we were able to trace the upper generations to be disease free. Two hundred Turkish control samples without any neurologic complaints were either anonymously collected from Haydarpasa State Hospital Microbiology Department or chosen from healthy family members of the patients (96 males and 104 females). Informed consent was obtained from all the individuals. The Ethics Committee of Boğaziçi Universityapproved this study. Additionally, all novel mutations identified in this study were further questioned in the Turkish exome database of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK).

2.2. Mutation screening

DNA was extracted from white blood cells using the MagNAPure Compact DNA Isolation System (Roche, Switzerland). Mutation screening was performed systematically in all fALS patients for C9orf72, SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and UBQLN2 genes using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based Sanger sequencing (Macrogen, Korea; Refgen, Ankara and Iontek, Istanbul, Turkey), and only unrelated patients, 1 proband from each family, were included into mutation frequency calculations. All coding sequences of SOD1 and UBQLN2, including the flanking regions, exons 14 and 15 of FUS, and exon 5 of TARDBP were screened. The hexanucleotide repeat of C9orf72 was analyzed by repeat-primed-PCR and fragment length analysis (Renton et al., 2011).

sALS patients were so far screened for C9orf72, SOD1, and UBQLN2 mutations. Results were evaluated using the Chromas (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Australia) and Peak Scanner software (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The sequences of primers used for the amplifications are available on request.

For SOD1-D90A haplotype analysis, 12 microsatellite markers were used, which are available on request. Haplotypes from 3 Turkish D90A patients and their unaffected family members were compared with the haplotypes of 21 Scandinavian D90A patients (samples kindly provided by Peter Andersen, Umea University, Sweden). A subset of these markers was also used to perform haplotype analysis for the Turkish and Chinese patients carrying the SOD1-A4S mutation (DNA samples of the Chinese patient kindly sent by Mitsuya Morita, Tochigi-ken, Honshu, Japan).

2.3. Exome sequencing analyses

All fALS patients, which could not be solved via conventional mutation screening methods, were subjected to whole-exome capture analysis at TUBITAK, Yale University, and University of Massachusetts Schools of Medicine. Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 2500 DNA sequencing platforms. Alignment to the human reference genome (hg19) was accomplished using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner. Genome Analysis Toolkit was used for the quality control assessment and variant calling. Annotations of all variants were done by the ANNOVAR software. Filtering of the variants was performed using 1000 Genomes Project, NHLBI ESP, Exome Variant Server, and dbSNP versions. The presence and absence of all the variants, identified by whole-exome capture analysis, were confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing in patients and their affected and unaffected family members.

Potential impacts of novel mutations in this study were evaluated using functional online prediction programs, PolyPhen-2, PROVEAN, and SIFT; ClustalW2 estimated the conservation statuses of the mutation sites.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical findings

Four hundred and seventy-seven Turkish patients diagnosed with ALS participated in this study. Table 1 compiles the clinical features of the Turkish patient cohort consisting of 443 probands and 34 affected family members.

Table 1.

Clinical features of the Turkish cohort

Clinical features Total fALS sALS
# 477 116 361
 M 285 63 222
 F 193 53 140
 M:F 1.5 1.2 1.6
SO
 Limb 273 81 192
 Bulbar 79 11 68
 Limb + bulbar 34 5 29
 Unknown 89 17 72
AO
 Mean ± SD 47.2 ± 16 41.9 ± 18 48.9 ± 15
 M ± SD 46.5 ± 16 40.1 ± 18 48.5 ± 15
 F ± SD 48.1 ± 16 44.2 ± 18 49.5 ± 15
 Juvenile (<25) 51 27 24
 Middle (25–45) 135 29 106
 Late (>45) 251 52 199
 Unknown 39 8 31
 Range 8–80 8–80 9–80

Key: ALS, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; AO, age of onset; F, female; fALS, familial ALS; M, male; sALS, sporadic ALS; SD, standard deviation; SO, site of onset; #, numbers.

3.2. Genetic findings

The genetic and clinical findings of 116 fALS and 361 sALS patients with defined mutations are compiled in Table 2, and the origins of the patients are indicated in Fig. 1. Pedigrees with corresponding numbers are provided in Figs. 2 and 3 and Supplementary Figs. 14. We report C9orf72, SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and UBQLN2 mutation frequencies as 18.3%, 12.2%, 5%, 3.7%, and 2.4% in fALS cases, respectively. Exome sequencing revealed mutations in OPTN, SPG11, DJ1, PLEKHG5, SYNE1, SQSTM1, and TRPM7 in several pedigrees. In 361 sALS patients, no SOD1 lesions were present; however, mutations in C9orf72 (3.1%) and UBQLN2 (0.6%) were found.

Table 2.

Genetic and clinical parameters of individuals with defined mutations

Family Sex AO SO Inheritance Mutation Predominating features
fALS
 C9ORF72#1 M 32 L AD Expansiona,b Fast progression
 C9ORF72#2 F 46 NA AD -
 C9ORF72#3 M 46 B AD -
 C9ORF72#4 M 56 L AD -
 C9ORF72#5 M 80 L AD -
 C9ORF72#6 M 63 L AD -
 C9ORF72#7 F 37 L AD -
 C9ORF72#8 F 62 L AD -
 C9ORF72#9 F 58 L AD Expansiona,b Dementia
F 57 - Frontotemporal dementia
 C9ORF72#10 M 58 L AD Expansiona,b -
M 46 B Dementia
F 53 B -
 C9ORF72#11 F 63 B AD Expansiona,b -
 C9ORF72#12 M 71 L AD -
 C9ORF72#13 M 54 L AD Concurrent UBQLN2-S340I
 C9ORF72#14 F 63 L AD -
 C9ORF72#15 M 62 L AD ALS-parkinsonism-dementia complex
 SOD1#1 M 19 L AD H71Y* Very fast progression, ip
F 57 L Very fast progression, ip
 SOD1#2 M 49 L AR D90Ac Stereotyped Scandinavian phenotype
 SOD1#3 M 55 L AR D90Ac Stereotyped Scandinavian phenotype
 SOD1#4 F 45 L AR D90Ac Stereotyped Scandinavian phenotype
 SOD1#5 M 20 L AD A4Sd Rapidly progressive atrophy
F 44 L Slow progression
 SOD1#6 M 28 L AR N86Se Very fast progression
 SOD1#7 F 52 L AD L144Ff Classical ALS
 SOD1#8 M 59 L AD L144Ff Classical ALS
 SOD1#9 F 54 L AD L144Ff Classical ALS
 SOD1#10 F 46 L AD V149Gf Classical ALS
 FUS#1 M 16 L AD Δ144–149aag ip
 FUS#2 F 32 L AD R524M* ip
 FUS#3 M 53 L AD R524M* Fast progression
 FUS#4 M 14 L AD P525Lh De novo, fast progression
 TDP-43#1 M 58 L AD A315Ti -
F 58 L Man in barrel syndrome
 TDP-43#2 F 57 L AD A315Ti -
 TDP-43#3 F 42 L + B AD I383Vj -
M 67 L + B Fast progression
 UBQLN2#1 M 26 L X linked P506Sk -
 UBQLN2#2 M 22 L X linked P525Sl ip
 OPTN#1 M 42 L AR ΔAA del at P.359* -
M 48 L -
M NA L -
F 43 B -
 OPTN#2 F 30 NA AR ΔAA del at P.359* -
 OPTN#3 M 33 B AR M98K/G291fs* -
M 36 L -
 SPG11#1 M 23 L AR N1962S*/Y2272X* -
 SPG11#2 F 14 L AR F2265L* -
M 16 L -
 DJ1#1 M 24 L AR Q45X* ALS-parkinsonism-dementia complex
F NA NA
 PLEKHG5#1 M 13 L AR P630H* Lower motor neuron dominance
 SYNE#1 M 20 L AR Q7644X* Spastic ataxic gait, dysarthria, dysmetria, fast progression
M 21 L
 SYNE#2 F 26 L AR R7842X* Spastic ataxic gait, dysarthria, dysmetria, oculomotor abnormality
F 17 L
F 30 L
 TRPM7/SQSTM1#1 M 17 L AD T1482Im/E274Dn -
M 19 L -
sALS
 C9ORF72 F 69 L Sporadic Expansiona,b Dementia, fast progression
M 48 NA -
M 49 NA -
F 48 L + B -
F 55 L -
M 42 L -
F 52 L -
M 53 L -
M 56 L + B -
M 69 B Dementia
M 60 L -
 UBQLN2 M 14 L Sporadic M392I* Drop foot
F 16 L M392I* Madras-type MND

Key: AD, autosomal dominant; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; AO, age of onset; AR, autosomal recessive; B, bulbar; F, female; fALS, familial ALS; ip, incomplete penetrance; L, limb; M, male; MND, motor neuron disease; N, normal; NA, not available; sALS, sporadic ALS; SO, site of onset;

*,

Novel.

n

rs55793208.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mutations in Turkey. Cities of origin are shown, the brackets indicate the number of families, and the asterisk specifies novel mutations.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Five Turkish pedigrees with different ALS mutations.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Turkish pedigrees with UBQLN2 mutations

3.2.1. C9orf72

The dominant hexanucleotide repeat expansion on chromosome 9 (C9orf72) was heterozygously present in 18 fALS patients and 11 apparently sALS cases (Table 2). In a few families with this mutation, disease progression was fast. Three out of 4 C9orf72 expansion carriers in our cohort exhibited frontotemporal dementia–type dementia in addition to motor neuron symptoms, and 1 had only dementia. Intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneity was observed in several pedigrees, and 1 patient had ALS-parkinsonism-dementia complex (families C9orf72#1, C9orf72#2, and C9orf72#3) (Fig. 2).

3.2.2. SOD1

Sequencing the coding regions of the SOD1 gene revealed 6 different mutations (H71Y, D90A, A4S, N86S, L144F, and V149G) in 11 fALS patients; D90A and L144F were present in 3 families (Table 2). None of the sALS cases was found to carry SOD1 mutation.

The H71Y mutation (family SOD1#1), not reported before, was identified in heterozygous form in a young fALS patient with a very fast disease progression of 1 year (Table 2, Fig. 2). The father, currently 50-year old, carries the same mutation without manifesting the disease, whereas a paternal aunt, also gene positive, has succumbed to ALS at the age of 57 years within 8 months. This variant was not present in ALSoD, dbSNP, 1000 Genomes, Exome Server Database, and in 200 Turkish controls, whom we screened for H71Y. The mutation was also not present in approximately 600 individual in the TÜBİTAK exome database. All 3, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, and PROVEAN, tools indicate this change in a highly conserved position of SOD1 as deleterious.

SOD1-D90A was shown to behave as a recessive trait in 3 Turkish families (SOD1#2, SOD1#3, and SOD1#4), whose clinical phenotypes displayed the stereotyped lower limb onset with mild and prolonged disease (Andersen et al., 1995, Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). Evidence for a common ancestry between these 3 families and the Scandinavian patients was confirmed by the haplotype analysis.

The rare SOD1-A4S mutation is defined in this study in a large family (SOD1#5) from the northern coast of Turkey. ALS is dominantly segregating in 4 affected members of the family with intrafamilial heterogeneity in disease onset and progression (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). The A4S mutation has only been reported once in the literature in a Chinese patient whose phenotype was not described (Nakanishi et al., 1998). Haplotype analysis of both the Turkish and Chinese patients did not reveal a clear overlap for a common ancestry; using more markers would clarify whether both patients have common origins.

In family SOD1#6, the homozygous N86S mutation was present in one of the offspring of a consanguineous couple. The early-onset and the fast disease progression in the patient are also in agreement with a previous report (Hayward et al., 1998). L144F and V149G mutations were found in the index cases of families SOD1#7, SOD1#8, SOD1#9, and SOD1#10 (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 2).

3.2.3. FUS and TARDBP

Sequencing of exons 14 and 15 of the FUS gene revealed 2 known and the novel R524M mutations in 4 patients. The heterozygous deletion of 18 nucleotides in the well-conserved QGSY-rich region of FUS (ΔG144-Y149) was identified in a juvenile male patient (FUS#1). The mother (51 years) and the maternal grandfather (>80 years) of the proband, carrying the same deletion, were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Incomplete penetrance was also observed in families FUS#2 and FUS#3 with multiple affected sibs with the novel R524M mutation. DNA analysis of the asymptomatic parents in FUS#2 is in process (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 3). The P525L mutation in the deceased juvenile male patient of family FUS#4, which is absent in both parents investigated, seems to be a de novo mutation (Table 2, Fig. 2).

The TDP43-A315T mutation was identified in 2 unrelated families (TDP-43#1 and TDP-43#2). The affected sibs in family TDP-43#1 presented with distinct ALS phenotypes. The I383V mutation identified in family TDP-43#3 resulted in different disease manifestations in the father and his daughter regarding onset and progression (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 3).

3.2.4. UBQLN2

All 477 individuals with ALS and 200 neurologically healthy control subjects were screened for the entire coding sequence of the UBQLN2 gene. This revealed 3 distinct nonsynonymous variations: P506S (novel), P525S in 2 fALS, and M392I (novel) in 2 sALS cases (Table 2, Fig. 3).

The S340I change was identified in 3 unrelated families. The proband of family UBQLN2#3 (age of onset, 12 years), offspring of a first cousin marriage, has a slow progressive disease and inborn mental retardation. The bedridden grandfather (>80 years), also gene positive, manifests a similar slow progressive motor neuron type of disease with slight mental retardation, whereas the mother (48 years) and the older brother (30 years) of the proband, both carriers of S340I, are asymptomatic. In family UBQLN2#4, dementia in the index case is very dominant. In this generation, there are 3 female patients deceased with ALS and an older sister of the proband with manifested disease for 6 years. Her older brother, S340I positive, is currently asymptomatic. Another family (UBQLN2#5) consists of a proband with the S340I mutation and his yet asymptomatic mother, who is gene positive (Fig. 3).

Among 361 sALS cases investigated, a novel M392I variation was detected in 2 unrelated juvenile patients (Table 2). 1000 Genomes, dbSNP, and Exome Server databases do not contain this variation, which was also absent in 200 Turkish control samples. The mutation was also not present in approximately 600 individual in the TÜBİTAK exome database.

3.2.5. Genes identified by exome sequencing analyses

Out of 116 fALS patients investigated by conventional PCR-based techniques, 40% of our cohort was solved. The remaining ALS cases were subjected to whole-exome sequencing, which revealed several rarely mutated genes, so far in 10 distinct families.

The novel AA deletion in the OPTN gene identified in 2 consanguineous families, OPTN#1 and OPTN#2, leads to a frame-shift at codon 359, resulting in a truncated protein. In the 4 affected members of the OPTN#1 family, there is an apparent intrafamilial clinical heterogeneity, patient IV.3 presenting with cognitive impairment at her late 30s. In the second family (OPTN#2), there are 3 affected sibs all of whom succumbed to ALS within 2–8 years (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4).

In a family, where 2 young sibs from consanguineous parents had a complicated differential diagnosis, exome sequencing revealed the presence of a homozygous mutation, F2265L, in SPG11. Both patients now in their 30s have slow progression and long disease duration in accordance with the previous reports (Daoud et al., 2012; Orlacchio et al., 2010) (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4).

In a consanguineous family with 10 children, 3 were reported with clinical features of motor neuron disease in addition to predominating parkinsonism and dementia. Exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous nonsense mutation in the DJ1 gene (Q45X), previously reported as cause of Parkinson’s disease and ALS-parkinsonism-dementia complex (Annesi et al., 2005). The mutation was validated by Sanger sequencing in the family members available (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4).

Another novel homozygous variation (P630H) was identified in the PLEKHG5 gene of a very young male patient (age of onset, 13 years) from consanguineous parents. The child presented with a lower motor neuron type of disease with slow progression, phenotypically resembling the family described in the large pedigree from Mali (Maystadt et al., 2007) (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). We have also identified novel mutations (Q7644X and R7842X) in the SYNE1 gene (previously related to pure ataxia) in 2 independent families harboring several individuals diagnosed with motor neuron disease accompanied by ataxia (Table 2).

In 3 of our families, complex inheritance is suspected. In the first family, the proband has inherited 2 different SPG11 mutations (N1962S and Y2272X) in homozygous state. In the second family, 2 OPTN mutations (M98K and G291fs) were found in 2 sibs again in homozygous state. In both families, parents are first cousins. SPG11-Y2272X and OPTN-G291fs mutations are novel. Additionally, there is a third family in our cohort in which 2 juvenile ALS patients (sibs) have dominant mutations in 2 distinct genes, TRPM7 (T1482I) and SQSTM1 (E274D), previously reported as rare causes of ALS-parkinsonism-dementia complex and ALS, respectively (Fecto et al., 2011; Hermosura et al., 2005). The parents and the sister of the probands were unaffected at the time of diagnosis and are unfortunately not available to us for further analysis (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4).

4. Discussion

Turkey, with its wealthy historical background and unique geography at the southeastern border of Europe, forms a natural bridge between Europe and Asia. The large coastal areas at the Mediterranean Sea and extensive rural parts bordering the Near Eastern countries and the Black Sea make Turkey a rich genetic pool with a high ethnic heterogeneity. In contrast with other European populations, in which family sizes have been decreasing steadily in the last 50 years, Turkey is still very dynamic, with high birth rates (17/1000 vs. 7–10/1000 in Europe) and traditionally large kindreds containing several living generations and an impressive number of offspring (www.cia.gov). Because close consanguineous marriages are still part of the Turkish culture, exceeding 60% in the eastern parts of the country, the number of autosomal recessively inherited forms of diseases is in excess of what is to be expected. Turkey’s population of 75 million is very young, 50% being younger than 30 years. The 40- to 74-year age bracket applies approximately to only 30% of the population. Lowered life expectancy and an earlier age at death from other diseases may also limit the size of the older more susceptible population. Moreover, because adequately designed epidemiological studies and a systematic medical registry throughout the country are not available, these factors altogether complicate complete case ascertainment; thus, we can only make rough estimations about the prevalence of ALS in Turkey, which is 6000–7000.

In this study, we have carried out a comprehensive nationwide genetic analysis of ALS. Because we are the major reference center in Turkey involved in systematic clinical investigation of basic and genetic research on ALS, we believe to have recruited the largest patient material; thus, the results described here are not only the first but also a realistic reflection of the distribution of ALS mutations in Turkey.

Our cohort consists of a total of 477 Turkish patients, 82 fALS families (including 116 patients), and 361 sALS cases. The rate of fALS across population-based studies is around 5%–10%, with a gradient falling from north to south of Europe (Novembre et al., 2008). Our patient population reflects a much higher rate of 17%. A plausible explanation for this high ratio in favor of fALS is the high consanguinity in our cohort, harboring 28 recessive inheritance patterns in 82 pedigrees. In addition, some of the recessive fALS patients may have been classified as sporadic, if there was no disease in another family member. On the other hand, sALS seems to have a significant genetic component of its own, making the picture between fALS and sALS blurred. Molecular findings have shown that the distinction between fALS and sALS is to a great extent artificial; several fALS-causing genes have been found mutated in apparently sALS, which may be because of low penetrance (Hanby et al., 2011). The most prominent example is the C9orf72 expansion displaying a relatively frequent cause of sALS.

The C9orf72 mutation shows variable frequencies in fALS cases worldwide with the highest numbers (46%) in Finland, compared with 18.3% in our Turkish fALS cohort. In sporadic cases, the frequencies are reported around 5% in Caucasian populations, again with the highest numbers in the Finnish population (21.1%); 3.1% was observed in our sALS population (Majounie et al., 2012). The AOs in our cohort were variable ranging from 32 to 80 years with a tendency to older onset, in accordance with the literature (Millecamps et al., 2012). Because C9orf72 considerably contributes to ALS and dementia in Turkey, it should be included in the screening strategy of Turkish ALS and also dementia patients.

The frequencies of SOD1 mutations in fALS have been reliably investigated in the Caucasian populations of North America and Europe (Andersen and Al-Chalabi, 2011; Pfister et al., 2013). Among the known SOD1 mutations, a geographical distribution begins to emerge, as more ethnic groups are being screened. Interestingly, there seems to be a north-south gradient decreasing across Europe with higher numbers in Sweden (35%) and Finland (42.9%) and lower rates in Mediterranean countries (~15%) (Battistini et al., 2005; Gamez et al., 2006; Rabe et al., 2010). The 12.2% frequency of SOD1 in Turkish fALS families is consistent with other Mediterranean countries.

Among the SOD1 mutations identified in this study, the heterozygous H71Y mutation changes a positively charged histidine to a neutral tyrosine, which may affect the conformation of SOD1. The conserved location and the findings of prediction tools support the deleterious nature of this variant, strongly contributing to the ALS phenotype in the proband and in the affected paternal aunt. The fact that the father and several close relatives in the family have not developed ALS, although gene positive, points to a variable penetrance rate of H71Y, which may be because of modifying genes (Fig. 2), to be unraveled via ongoing exome analysis.

Being unique among human genetic disorders, the D90A mutation has been identified both in recessive and dominant pedigrees. Independent of their geographical location, D90A recessive pedigrees share the same ancient founder haplotype. This applies also to all 3 D90A-ALS families in this study. The incomplete penetrance of homozygous D90A in family SOD1#4 is a very rare but a previously observed finding (P. Andersen, personal communication) (Supplementary Fig. 1).

TARDBP and FUS genes, with structural and functional similarities, were shown to be responsible for a considerable proportion of fALS and also sALS cases, suggesting for the first time mechanisms implicated in RNA biology in the development of ALS (Lattante et al., 2013). In our cohort, the mutation frequencies of TARDBP and FUS were 2.4% and 3.7%, respectively. The presence of the de novo mutation, FUS-P525L, in a Turkish family is a common finding (Calvo et al., 2014).

Mutations in the X-linked UBQLN2 gene were first described in 5 ALS families in the Caucasian American population (2.0%) (Deng et al., 2011). Successive studies identified several fALS-linked UBQLN2 mutations with similar frequencies, whereas no mutations were shown in Dutch (Gellera et al., 2013; Millecamps et al., 2012; van Doormaal et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2012). Among the UBQLN2 mutations in our cohort, the P525S mutation was identified in 5 members of an extended family (UBQLN2#2) with close consanguinity. With 2 affected individuals in the family and several gene-positive family members, who are asymptomatic so far, an incomplete penetrance is expected, which may be explained by unequal X inactivation in the females, for example, the mother. Interestingly, the youngest brother was reported to have a different neurologic impairment with the features of Friedreich ataxia, which was excluded. Clinical follow-up of the family is important (Fig. 3).

The S340I variation in the UBQLN2 gene, so far only reported in a healthy individual without a neurodegenerative disease, was found in our cohort in 3 ALS families with several affected individuals (Dillen et al., 2013). However, in all families, the segregation of the disease with S340I was ambiguous because several gene-positive individuals are free of disease. The variation was found in 1 out of 200 Turkish controls and in an ALS patient with the C9orf72 mutation in our cohort. Additionally, S340I was also present in 1 Turkish patient with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) and in a Turkish schizophrenia patient and his unaffected mother (not included in the ALS cohort under study). This mutation is reported for the first time in this study in 3 independent families with several affected individuals as a possible cause of ALS. On the other hand, the presence of several unaffected but gene-positive individuals in these families renders the pathogenicity of this rarely reported variation, outside of the PXX domain, questionable.

The presence of the novel M392I mutation in 2 young ALS patients with no family history, but in none of the controls, supports the pathogenic nature of the mutation, located in a highly conserved region of the UBQLN2 gene. One of the patients had the clinical characteristics of the Madras pattern of motor neuron impairment with the only distinction of a fairly rapid progression. Functional and further genetic analyses are expected to enlighten the mechanisms and pathogenicity underlying UBQLN2-based disease.

Exome analyses of 10 families revealed several novel and known mutations in ALS-associated genes. Four of these, DJ1, SYNE1, SPG11, and PLEKHG5, do not give rise to classical ALS but rather to an early-onset lower motor neuron type of disease with slow progression. Mutations in the PLEKHG5 gene have been reported as rare causes of autosomal recessive lower motor neuron disease with childhood onset and distal hereditary motor neuropathy. The homozygous P630H missense mutation in a highly conserved position of the protein, preceding the PH domain, similar to the P647S mutation reported earlier, gives rise to a lower motor neuron disease with slow progression in the juvenile patient (Maystadt et al., 2007). The PH domain, involved in motor neuron maintenance and protection, is also implicated in the ALS2 gene, a causative gene for juvenile ALS, primary lateral sclerosis, and infantile-onset ascending spastic paraplegia (Hadano et al., 2001).

The recent wealth of genes giving rise to ALS and the increasing locus heterogeneity show us once more the complex nature of ALS. A recent and exciting finding, which carries ALS research to a new level of complexity, indicates that also fALS may have a complex and even oligogenic inheritance pattern, in which not only 1 gene but also several genes may be implicated. The 2 recessive families, one with 2 OPTN and the other with 2 SPG11 mutations, in addition to the dominant TRPM7/SQSTM1 family identified in this study, confirm the hypothesis. This wealth of genes is expected to allow usto pinpoint the precise genetics and the molecular mechanisms behind the disease, offering new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. A great question still elusive is, howand wherethe distinct pathways involved in the disease overlap and converge to cause the ALS phenotype.

Heterogeneity in the genetic substructure of European populations may be the result of variability in the underlying genetic structure of distinct geographical regions (Novembre et al., 2008). The epidemiology of ALS in Turkey has features representing the pattern seen in other Caucasian populations; however, it has also specific aspects, such as the more complex nature of the disease in molecular and clinical terms: (1) allelic and locus heterogeneity with >60% of fALS cases unsolved by conventional methods; (2) interfamilial and intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneities in large kindreds; (3) variable penetrance rate of mutations; (4) presence of novel mutations; and (5) overall incidence of younger onset. This complexity not only makes ALS research and diagnosis challenging in Turkey, rendering genetic counseling crucial, but also opens many novel opportunities, which can be translated into treatment.

The molecular analysis of ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders in Turkey is expected not only to reveal a complete picture of the distinct genetic background of an admixed population with novel features but also to provide notable insights into essential issues in ALS research that are still outstanding.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental File

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Suna and İnan Kıraç Foundation (SVIKV) (2005–2008, 2008–2011, 2011–2014), Bogazici University (Grant number 99HB0101 02OB0101 04B101D 08HB102 10B01P8 11B01P6) Research Funds (BAP), and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK -SBAG2007 COST-TUBITAK-SBAG2007 TUBITAK-EVRENA-SBAG2009). We gratefully acknowledge their generous contributions. We thank Ilknur Yıldız, Selda Dağdeviren, Irmak Şahbaz, Alireza Khodadadi Jamayran, Helena Alstermark, and Anna Birve for their excellent technical assistance. We extend our thanks to Professor Jeffrey D. Macklis (Harvard Medical School, MA, USA) and Professor Peter Andersen (Umea University, Umea, Sweden) for their constructive contributions to this study; to Professor Coşkun Özdemir and Dr Sevtap Savaş for the critical reading of the manuscript; and to Cemile Koçoğlu, Fulya Akçimen, and Hamid Hamzeiy for their assistance in the preparation of the figures and tables. Last but not least, we cordially thank our patients, their families, and the Turkish ALS Association for their invaluable cooperation. This study is dedicated to the memory of our esteemed collaborator Dr Hilmi Özçelik, who passed away on May 2, 2013.

Footnotes

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. DNA samples were collected with the approval of the relevant institutional ethic boards, and informed written consent was obtained from each participant.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.032.

References

  1. Al-Chalabi A, Jones A, Troakes C, King A, Al-Sarraj S, van den Berg LH, 2012. The genetics and neuropathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuro-pathol. 124, 339–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen PM, Al-Chalabi A, 2011. Clinical genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what do we really know? Nat. Rev. Neurol 7, 603–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen PM, Nilsson P, Ala-Hurula V, Keranen ML, Tarvainen I, Haltia T, Nilsson L, Binzer M, Forsgren L, Marklund SL, 1995. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for an Asp90Ala mutation in CuZn-superoxide dismutase. Nat. Genet 10, 61–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Annesi G, Savettieri G, Pugliese P, D’Amelio M, Tarantino P, Ragonese P, La Bella V, Piccoli T, Civitelli D, Annesi F, Fierro B, Piccoli F, Arabia G, Caracciolo M, Ciro Candiano IC, Quattrone A, 2005. DJ-1 mutations and parkinsonism-dementia-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis complex. Ann. Neurol 58, 803–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Battistini S, Giannini F, Greco G, Bibbo G, Ferrera L, Marini V, Causarano R, Casula M, Lando G, Patrosso MC, Caponnetto C, Origone P, Marocchi A, Del Corona A, Siciliano G, Carrera P, Mascia V, Giagheddu M, Carcassi C, Orru S, Garre C, Penco S, 2005. SOD1 mutations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Results from a multicenter Italian study. J. Neurol 252, 782–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belzil VV, Daoud H, St-Onge J, Desjarlais A, Bouchard JP, Dupre N, Lacomblez L, Salachas F, Pradat PF, Meininger V, Camu W, Dion PA, Rouleau GA, 2011. Identification of novel FUS mutations in sporadic cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler 12,113–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL, 2000. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Other Motor Neuron Disord 1, 293–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calvo A, Moglia C, Canosa A, Brunetti M, Barberis M, Traynor BJ, Carrara G, Valentini C, Restagno G, Chio A, 2014. A de novo nonsense mutation of the FUS gene in an apparently familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis case. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 1513.e7–1513.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chio A, Restagno G, Brunetti M, Ossola I, Calvo A, Mora G, Sabatelli M, Monsurro MR, Battistini S, Mandrioli J, Salvi F, Spataro R, Schymick J, Traynor BJ, La Bella V, 2009. Two Italian kindreds with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis due to FUS mutation. Neurobiol. Aging 30, 1272–1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Daoud H, Zhou S, Noreau A, Sabbagh M, Belzil V, Dionne-Laporte A, Tranchant C, Dion P, Rouleau GA, 2012. Exome sequencing reveals SPG11 mutations causing juvenile ALS. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 839.e5–839.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn H, Adamson J, Kouri N, Wojtas A, Sengdy P, Hsiung GY, Karydas A, Seeley WW, Josephs KA, Coppola G, Geschwind DH, Wszolek ZK, Feldman H, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Miller BL, Dickson DW, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, Rademakers R, 2011. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 72, 245–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng HX, Chen W, Hong ST, Boycott KM, Gorrie GH, Siddique N, Yang Y, Fecto F, Shi Y, Zhai H, Jiang H, Hirano M, Rampersaud E, Jansen GH, Donkervoort S, Bigio EH, Brooks BR, Ajroud K, Sufit RL, Haines JL, Mugnaini E, Pericak-Vance MA, Siddique T, 2011. Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature 477, 211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deng HX, Hentati A, Tainer JA, Iqbal Z, Cayabyab A, Hung WY, Getzoff ED, Hu P, Herzfeldt B, Roos RP, Warner C, Deng G, Soriano E, Smyth C, Parge HE, Ahmed A, Roses AD, Hallewell RA, Pericak-Vance MA, Siddique T, 1993. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and structural defects in Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase. Science 261, 1047–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dillen L, Van Langenhove T, Engelborghs S, Vandenbulcke M, Sarafov S, Tournev I, Merlin C, Cras P, Vandenberghe R, De Deyn PP, Jordanova A, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C, van der Zee J, 2013. Explorative genetic study of UBQLN2 and PFN1 in an extended Flanders-Belgian cohort of frontotemporal lobar degeneration patients. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 1711.e1–1711.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fecto F, Yan J, Vemula SP, Liu E, Yang Y, Chen W, Zheng JG, Shi Y, Siddique N, Arrat H, Donkervoort S, Ajroud-Driss S, Sufit RL, Heller SL, Deng HX, Siddique T, 2011. SQSTM1 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch. Neurol 68, 1440–1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferraiuolo L, Kirby J, Grierson AJ, Sendtner M, Shaw PJ, 2011. Molecular pathways of motor neuron injury in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol 7, 616–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gamez J, Corbera-Bellalta M, Nogales G, Raguer N, Garcia-Arumi E, Badia-Canto M, Llado-Carbo E, Alvarez-Sabin J, 2006. Mutational analysis of the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene in a Catalan ALS population: should all sporadic ALS cases also be screened for SOD1? J. Neurol. Sci 247, 21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gellera C, Tiloca C, Del Bo R, Corrado L, Pensato V, Agostini J, Cereda C, Ratti A, Castellotti B, Corti S, Bagarotti A, Cagnin A, Milani P, Gabelli C, Riboldi G, Mazzini L, Soraru G, D’Alfonso S, Taroni F, Comi GP, Ticozzi N, Silani V, SLAGEN Consortium, 2013. Ubiquilin 2 mutations in Italian patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84,183–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gitcho MA, Baloh RH, Chakraverty S, Mayo K, Norton JB, Levitch D, Hatanpaa KJ, White CL 3rd, Bigio EH, Caselli R, Baker M, Al-Lozi MT, Morris JC, Pestronk A, Rademakers R, Goate AM, Cairns NJ, 2008. TDP-43 A315T mutation in familial motor neuron disease. Ann. Neurol 63, 535–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hadano S, Hand CK, Osuga H, Yanagisawa Y, Otomo A, Devon RS, Miyamoto N, Showguchi-Miyata J, Okada Y, Singaraja R, Figlewicz DA, Kwiatkowski T, Hosler BA, Sagie T, Skaug J, Nasir J, Brown RH Jr., Scherer SW, Rouleau GA, Hayden MR, Ikeda JE, 2001. A gene encoding a putative GTPase regulator is mutated in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2. Nat. Genet 29, 166–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanby MF, Scott KM, Scotton W, Wijesekera L, Mole T, Ellis CE, Leigh PN, Shaw CE, Al-Chalabi A, 2011. The risk to relatives of patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 134, 3454–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayward C, Brock DJ, Minns RA, Swingler RJ, 1998. Homozygosity for Asn86Ser mutation in the CuZn-superoxide dismutase gene produces a severe clinical phenotype in a juvenile onset case of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Med. Genet 35, 174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hermosura MC, Nayakanti H, Dorovkov MV, Calderon FR, Ryazanov AG, Haymer DS, Garruto RM, 2005. A TRPM7 variant shows altered sensitivity to magnesium that may contribute to the pathogenesis of two Guamanian neurodegenerative disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 102, 11510–11515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lattante S, Rouleau GA, Kabashi E, 2013. TARDBP and FUS mutations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: summary and update. Hum. Mutat 34, 812–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Majounie E, Renton AE, Mok K, Dopper EG, Waite A, Rollinson S, Chio A, Restagno G, Nicolaou N, Simon-Sanchez J, van Swieten JC, Abramzon Y, Johnson JO, Sendtner M, Pamphlett R, Orrell RW, Mead S, Sidle KC, Houlden H, Rohrer JD, Morrison KE, Pall H, Talbot K, Ansorge O, Hernandez DG, Arepalli S, Sabatelli M, Mora G, Corbo M, Giannini F, Calvo A, Englund E, Borghero G, Floris GL, Remes AM, Laaksovirta H, McCluskey L, Trojanowski JQ, Van Deerlin VM, Schellenberg GD, Nalls MA, Drory VE, Lu CS, Yeh TH, Ishiura H, Takahashi Y, Tsuji S, Le Ber I, Brice A, Drepper C, Williams N, Kirby J, Shaw P, Hardy J, Tienari PJ, Heutink P, Morris HR, Pickering-Brown S, Traynor BJ, 2012. Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 323–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maystadt I, Rezsohazy R, Barkats M, Duque S, Vannuffel P, Remacle S, Lambert B, Najimi M, Sokal E, Munnich A, Viollet L, Verellen-Dumoulin C, 2007. The nuclear factor kappaB-activator gene PLEKHG5 is mutated in a form ofautosomal recessive lower motor neuron disease with childhood onset. Am. J. Hum. Genet 81, 67–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Millecamps S, Corcia P, Cazeneuve C, Boillee S, Seilhean D, Danel-Brunaud V, Vandenberghe N, Pradat PF, Le Forestier N, Lacomblez L, Bruneteau G, Camu W, Brice A, Meininger V, LeGuern E, Salachas F, 2012. Mutations in UBQLN2 are rare in French amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 839.e1–839.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nakanishi T, Kishikawa M, Miyazaki A, Shimizu A, Ogawa Y, Sakoda S, Ohi T, Shoji H, 1998. Simple and defined method to detect the SOD-1 mutants from patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by mass spectrometry. J. Neurosci. Methods 81, 41–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Novembre J, Johnson T, Bryc K, Kutalik Z, Boyko AR, Auton A, Indap A, King KS, Bergmann S, Nelson MR, Stephens M, Bustamante CD, 2008. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature 456, 98–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Orlacchio A, Babalini C, Borreca A, Patrono C, Massa R, Basaran S, Munhoz RP, Rogaeva EA, St George-Hyslop PH, Bernardi G, Kawarai T, 2010. SPATACSIN mutations cause autosomal recessive juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 133, 591–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pasinelli P, Brown RH, 2006. Molecular biology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: insights from genetics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 7, 710–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pfister T, Sekhon R, White M, Scott P, Munro S, Johnston M, Kalra S, Korngut L, 2013. Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Alberta, Canada. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener 14, 273–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rabe M, Felbecker A, Waibel S, Steinbach P, Winter P, Muller U, Ludolph AC, 2010. The epidemiology of CuZn-SOD mutations in Germany: a study of 217 families. J. Neurol 257, 1298–1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, Simon-Sanchez J, Rollinson S, Gibbs JR, Schymick JC, Laaksovirta H, van Swieten JC, Myllykangas L, Kalimo H, Paetau A, Abramzon Y, Remes AM, Kaganovich A, Scholz SW, Duckworth J, Ding J, Harmer DW, Hernandez DG, Johnson JO, Mok K, Ryten M, Trabzuni D, Guerreiro RJ, Orrell RW, Neal J, Murray A, Pearson J, Jansen IE, Sondervan D, Seelaar H, Blake D, Young K, Halliwell N, Callister JB, Toulson G, Richardson A, Gerhard A, Snowden J, Mann D, Neary D, Nalls MA, Peuralinna T, Jansson L, Isoviita VM, Kaivorinne AL, Holtta-Vuori M, Ikonen E, Sulkava R, Benatar M, Wuu J, Chio A, Restagno G, Borghero G, Sabatelli M, Heckerman D, Rogaeva E, Zinman L, Rothstein JD, Sendtner M, Drepper C, Eichler EE, Alkan C, Abdullaev Z, Pack SD, Dutra A, Pak E, Hardy J, Singleton A, Williams NM, Heutink P, Pickering-Brown S, Morris HR, Tienari PJ, Traynor BJ, 2011. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 72, 257–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rutherford NJ, Zhang YJ, Baker M, Gass JM, Finch NA, Xu YF, Stewart H, Kelley BJ, Kuntz K, Crook RJ, Sreedharan J, Vance C, Sorenson E, Lippa C, Bigio EH, Geschwind DH, Knopman DS, Mitsumoto H, Petersen RC, Cashman NR, Hutton M, Shaw CE, Boylan KB, Boeve B, Graff-Radford NR, Wszolek ZK, Caselli RJ, Dickson DW, Mackenzie IR, Petrucelli L, Rademakers R, 2008. Novel mutations in TARDBP (TDP-43) in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ticozzi N, Tiloca C, Morelli C, Colombrita C, Poletti B, Doretti A, Maderna L, Messina S, Ratti A, Silani V, 2011. Genetics of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch. Ital. Biol 149, 65–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van Doormaal PT, van Rheenen W, van Blitterswijk M, Schellevis RD, Schelhaas HJ, de Visser M, van der Kooi AJ, Veldink JH, van den Berg LH, 2012. UBQLN2 in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in The Netherlands. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 2233.e7–2233.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vengoechea J, David MP, Yaghi SR, Carpenter L, Rudnicki SA, 2013. Clinical variability and female penetrance in X-linked familial FTD/ALS caused by a P506S mutation in UBQLN2. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener 14, 615–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams KL, Warraich ST, Yang S, Solski JA, Fernando R, Rouleau GA, Nicholson GA, Blair IP, 2012. UBQLN2/ubiquilin 2 mutation and pathology in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 2527.e3–2527.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental File

RESOURCES