Table 4.
A review of literature on en-bloc resection within recent 5 years
| Author: device | N | Tumour size; cm | Tumour number | Operation time; min | Reference/Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-ERBT | |||||
| Kramer: Monopolar | 91 | 2.13 (0.71) | 1.48 (0.74) | 27.19 (11.96) | [17]/2015 |
| Kramer: Bipolar | 65 | 2.25 (0.71) | 1.62 (0.86) | ||
| Hurle | 74 | 1.98 (0.59)a | 1 (1–4) | – | [14]/2016 |
| L-ERBT | |||||
| Liu: Thulium YAG | 64 | 1.31 (0.23) | 2.8 (1.2) | 48.2 (15.8) | [18]/2013 |
| He: Green-light KTP | 45 | 1.8 (0.8–3.0) | – | 21 (12–38) | [19]/2014 |
| Chen: Thulium YAG | 71 | 2.6 (1.4) | 1.8 (1.5) | 56.5 (37.4) | [20]/2015 |
| Muto: Thulium YAG | 55 | 2.36 (1.47) | 33 (14) | [21]/2015 | |
| Kramer; Holmium YAG | 50 | 2.63 (0.79) | 1.36 (0.56) | 29.65 (12.46) | [17]/2015 |
| Kramer: Thulium YAG | 15 | 1.66 (0.73) | 2.60 (0.73) | ||
| Migliari: Thulium | 58 | 2.5 (0.5–4.5) | – | 25 (12–30) | [22]/2015 |
| Chen: Green-light LBO | 83 | 1.85 (1.07) | 1.76 (0.81) | 21.46 (10.42) | [23]/2016 |
| Zhang: Vela | 38 | 2.1 (0.8–3.0) | – | 23 (15–43) | [24]/2017 |
| D’souza: Holmium YAG | 27 | 1.58 (0.31) | 2.5 (1.5) | 58.2 (15.8) | [25]/2017 |
Data were showed as mean (SD or range)
aAmong 74 patients, 6 underwent a combination of ERBT and TURBT E-ERBT electrical en-bloc resection of bladder tumor, L-ERBT laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumor, YAG Yttrium Aluminum Garnet, KTP potassium-titanyl-phosphate, LBO lithium triborate