Table 2.
Logit regression analyses for association between contract-signers and socio-demographics of household at baseline
Dependent variable: | Contract signed | Contract signed |
---|---|---|
Explanatory variables | ||
Household characteristics | ||
Total number of members | −0.02 (0.10) |
−0.01 (0.11) |
Stove used in the past 30 days: baseline | ||
Portable charcoal stove | 2.06 (1.28) |
1.98 (1.29) |
Fixed charcoal stove | 1.73 (1.29) |
1.59 (1.29) |
Number of durable goods | 0.23** (0.11) |
0.23** (0.11) |
Own any land | −0.22 (0.60) |
−0.27 (0.70) |
Log of per capita total expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF) | −1.04* (0.61) |
−1.07* (0.55) |
Log of per capita cooking fuel expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF) | −0.29 (0.19) |
−0.31* (0.18) |
Log of per capita hygiene expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF) | 1.00*** (0.36) |
1.11*** (0.37) |
Primary cook characteristics | ||
Hired | 0.85 (0.58) |
0.94 (0.59) |
Female | 1.28** (0.56) |
1.07** (0.52) |
Household head characteristics | ||
Female | −0.17 (0.69) |
0.01 (0.62) |
Age (in years) | 0.01 (0.02) |
0.00 (0.02) |
Married | 0.97 (0.64) |
1.09* (0.64) |
Secondary and above education level | −0.37 (0.46) |
−0.34 (0.45) |
Think that some stoves produce less smoke than others | −1.03 (1.26) |
|
Think that some fuels produce less smoke than others | 1.08 (1.22) |
|
Ever heard about cooking practices negatively impacting own health and health of young children | 1.10* (0.65) |
|
Ever heard about cooking practices negatively impacting forests | −1.60** (0.74) |
|
Ever heard about cooking practices negatively impacting local air quality | −0.09 (0.60) |
|
Constant | −0.56 (5.59) |
−0.33 (5.28) |
Observations | 144 | 144 |
Adjusted R-squared | 0.20 | 0.23 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses.
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.1
Traditional stoves is the referent category for 'stove used in the past 30 days: baseline'.
TVET and levels below (primary, pre-primary and no education) is the referent category for 'secondary and above education level of household head'.