Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ecohealth. 2019 Jan 7;16(1):7–20. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1391-9

Table 5.

Regression analysis for total time of primary cooks spent on activities (past 7 days)1,2,3

Dependent variables: Cooking Childcare
and
cleaning
Non-
agricultural
activities
Wage
labor
Casual
or day
labor
Other
DiD coefficient (treatment effect) −3.41
(2.96)
−3.44
(5.35)
3.74
(5.11)
−2.74
(3.56)
−0.23
(0.65)
1.19
(0.82)
FE coefficient −4.86**
(2.20)
0.21
(3.59)
2.17
(3.29)
−0.93
(2.35)
0.00
(1.10)
0.14
(0.91)

Observations 182 182 182 182 182 182

Robust standard errors in parentheses.

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1

1.

Household characteristics controlled for: household size, baseline stove used in past 30 days, number of durable goods, ownership of land, log of per capita baseline total expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF), log of per capita baseline cooking fuel expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF), log of per capita baseline hygiene expenditure in last 4 weeks (in RWF). Traditional stoves is the referent category for 'stove used in the past 30 days: baseline'.

2.

Primary cook characteristics controlled for: hired, female. Household head characteristics controlled for: female, age (in years), married, secondary and above education level. TVET and levels below (primary, pre-primary and no education) is the referent category for 'secondary and above education level of household head'.

3.

The sample is truncated to 91 primary cooks only who were present at baseline and midline1 data collection rounds.