Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2019 Jan 14;22(2):284–288. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0303-1

Fig 4. Cortical reinstatement effects.

Fig 4.

(a) Cortical temporal modulation scores across regions previously implicated in recollection and recall of contextual or detail memory including the retrosplenial cortex (RSC, t=−0.0027, df=18, two-tailed p=0.9979, minimum=−.5316, 25th percentile=−0.2357, median=0.0012, 75th percentile=0.2478, maximum=0.536), precuneus (PreC, t=1.685, df=18, two-tailed p=0.1093, minimum=−0.2382, 25th percentile=−0.0648, median=0.0345, 75th percentile=0.1931, maximum=0.4965), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC, t=2.7984 df=18, two-tailed p=0.0119, minimum=−0.0851, 25th percentile=−0.0426, median=0.0571, 75th percentile=0.1635, maximum=0.295), angular gyrus (AG, t=3.3742, df=18, two-tailed p=0.0034, minimum=−0.1062, 25th percentile=0.0197, median=0.0984, 75th percentile=0.2662, maximum=0.4543), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC, t=2.899, df=18, two-tailed p=0.0096, minimum=−0.1148, 25th percentile=−0.0118, median=0.1211, 75th percentile=0.2584, maximum=0.0846), and the whole hippocampus (Hipp, t=3.9518, df=18, two-tailed p=0.0021, minimum=−0.0784, 25th percentile=−0.0077, median=0.1245, 75th percentile=0.3094, maximum=0.6192) for reference. Only modulation scores in the PCC, AG, mPFC and Hipp are significantly different from zero (two-tailed one-sample t-tests, Bonferroni-Holm corrected, n=19 participants). Hipp is shown here for comparison.