Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 12;27(20):3202–3208.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.030

Figure 2. Comparisons Relating the Tianyuan Individual to Ancient and Present-Day Eurasians and Native Americans.

Figure 2.

(A) D(Tianyuan, X; Y, Mbuti) and D(Y, X; Tianyuan, Mbuti), where Y is the East and Southeast Asian Han or Ami or the Native American Mixe or Surui and X is the ancient West Eurasian individual Kostenki14, GoyetQ116–1, or Vestonice16.

(B) Maximum-likelihood tree showing East and Southeast Asians, Native Americans, and ancient Eurasians, with bootstrap support of 100% unless indicated otherwise. The scale bar shows the average standard error (SE) of the entries in the covariance matrix.

(C) D(GoyetQ116–1, Vestonice16; Y, Mbuti), where Y is the Tianyuan individual, an East and Southeast Asian population, or a Native American population.

For (A) and (C), thick bars are within 1 SE of the estimate, thin bars are within 1.96 SE of the estimate (95% confidence interval), and the dashed vertical line indicates D = 0. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S2 and S3.