Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;51(2):139–144. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17421

Table 4.

Comparisons of the parameters of both groups at T1, T2, and T3.

PTG Mean (SD) KTG Mean (SD)

T1–T2 T2–T3 T1–T3 T1–T2 T2–T3 T1–T3
Active ROM
Flexion 26 (9.6) 2.2 (14) 29 (11) 22 (13) 2.2 (6.9) 24 (13)
Abduction 30.7 (15.5) 5.7 (10.1) 36.5 (16.9) 29.7 (18.1) 3.0 (11.8) 32.7 (20.4)
Internal rotation 13.7 (8.5) 2.7 (7.8) 16.5 (8.7) 14.0 (11.1) 1.7 (6.3) 15.7 (11.7)
VAS pain gap
Rest 3.40 (1.56) 0.00 (0.72)* 3.40 (1.78) 3.15 (0.81) 0.65 (0.87) 3.80 (0.52)
Movement 6.00 (1.97)* 0.55 (1.31) 6.55 (1.90) 4.45 (1.82) 1.20 (1.9) 5.65 (2.25)
Night 6.15 (2.00)** 0.55 (1.09) 6.70 (2.00)* 3.6 (2.03) 1.35 (1.87) 4.95 (2.3)
ASESS-100 value gap 45.5 (16.8)** 3.10 (10.9)* 48.6 (19.8) 24.6 (20.3) 12.5 (16.9) 37.2 (17.4)
C–M scale value gap 18.8 (9.27) 4.65 (7.40) 23.5 (11.3) 23.8 (15.8) 5.50 (9.12) 29.3 (16.5)
WORC index value gap 854 (265)* 137 (152) 991 (244) 670 (254) 154 (292) 825 (323)

ROM: range of motion; PTG: physical therapy modalities group; KTG: kinesio taping group; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; ASESS-100: Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation; C–M: Constant–Murley; WORC index: Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index; SD: standard deviation.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001.

95% confidence interval