Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Jan 28;54:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.009
Karakas E, Furukawa H: Crystal structure of a heterotetrameric NMDA receptor ion channel. Science 2014, 344:992–997.
Lee C-H, Lu W, Michel JC, Goehring A, Du J, Song X, Gouaux E: NMDA receptor structures reveal subunit arrangement and pore architecture. Nature 2014, 511:191–197.
**
First structures of assembled heterotetrameric NMDARs via X-ray crystallographic studies for rat and frog NMDARs, showing alternating subunit arrangement and domain swap between the ATD layer and the LBD layer.
Tajima N, Karakas E, Grant T, Simorowski N, Diaz-Avalos R, Grigorieff N, Furukawa H: Activation of NMDA receptors and the mechanism of inhibition by ifenprodil. Nature 2016, 10.1038/nature17679 **
Cryo-EM structures of three major different agonist-bound classes suggest concerted movements of the ATD and the LBD are required to activate the NMDAR ion channel. The structure-based functional experiments validated the structural observation.
Lu W, Du J, Goehring A, Gouaux E: Cryo-EM structures of the triheteromeric NMDA receptor and its allosteric modulation. Science 2017, 355:eaal3729 **
First structure of the triheteromeric NMDAR using antibody fragments to distinguish highly similar subunits.
Regan MC, Grant T, McDaniel MJ, Karakas E, Zhang J, Traynelis SF, Grigorieff N, Furukawa H: Structural Mechanism of Functional Modulation by Gene Splicing in NMDA Receptors. Neuron 2018, 98:521–529 e523. **
Cryo-EM structure of GluN1b-GluN2B shows the structural organization of the exon 5- encoded motif at the ATD-LBD interface and a channel blocker MK-801 in the TMD.
Karakas E, Simorowski N, Furukawa H: Subunit arrangement and phenylethanolamine binding in GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors. Nature 2011, 475:249–253. *
Crystal structure of Xenopus GluN1 ATD and rat GluN2B ATD heterodimer shows that the ifenprodil binding site resides at the GluN1- GluN2B subunit interface. This study shows that the pattern of inter-GluN1-GluN2B interactions at ATD is distinct from those of non-NMDARs.
Gielen M, Retchless BS, Mony L, Johnson JW, Paoletti P: Mechanism of differential control of NMDA receptor activity by NR2 subunits. Nature 2009, 459:703–707
Yuan H, Hansen KB, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Traynelis SF: Control of NMDA receptor function by the NR2 subunit amino-terminal domain. J Neurosci 2009, 29:1204512058.
*
The subunit identity of ATD and the linker between ATD and LBD (ATD-LBD linker) influences channel open probability of the NMDARs, as shown by swapping the ATD and the ATD-LBD linker between GluN2A, GluN2B and GluN2D subunits.
Similarly, authors use GluN2A-GluN2D chimeras to show that the ATD not only influences channel open probability, but also mean open duration and deactivation time courses by extensive patch-clamp experiments.
Sobolevsky AI, Rosconi MP, Gouaux E: X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 2009, 462:745–756. *
First crystal structure of the intact AMPAR whose overall fold is distinct and less compact compared to the NMDAR.
Dolino DM, Chatterjee S, MacLean DM, Flatebo C, Bishop LDC, Shaikh SA, Landes CF, Jayaraman V: The structure- energy landscape of NMDA receptor gating. Nat Chem Biol 2017, 13:1232–1238. *
Single-molecular FRET studies probe different conformational states of the channel gate region of full-length GluN1/GluN2A receptors with several ligands.
'Declarations of interest: none