Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2019 Mar 27;129:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.018

Table 1:

Characteristics of patients receiving non-fused versus fused biopsies.

Method of biopsy P
Non-fused (n=121) Fused (n=90)
Age (y) 67 (59 to 70) 65 (59 to 70) 0.48
Race n (%)
African American 10 (8) 9 (10) 0.76
White 85 (71) 65 (72)
Hispanic 5 (4) 1 (1)
Other 15 (12) 11 (12)
Declined to answer 6 (5) 4 (5)
Family history n (%)
No 56 (46) 46 (52) 0.78
Yes 32 (27) 22 (24)
Unknown 33 (27) 22 (24)
Digital rectal examination findings n (%)
Normal 15 (12) 39 (43) <0.001
Abnormal 80 (66) 34 (38)
Not documented 26 (22) 17 (19)
Prior biopsy n (%)
None 57 (47) 53 (59) 0.10
Negative 64 (53) 37 (41)
PIRADS score
3 57 (47) 37 (41) 0.49
4 50 (41) 38 (42)
5 14 (12) 15 (17)
MR prostate volume (cm3) 51 (34 to 77) 49 (34 to 74) 0.88
Lesion maximum size (mm) 10 (7 to 12) 12 (7 to 15) 0.19
Location of lesion in prostate MR
Peripheral zone 86 (72) 58 (65) 0.66
Transition zone 27 (22) 21 (24)
Peripheral plus transition zone 4 (3) 7 (8)
Central zone 4 (3) 3 (3)
Prostate Health Index (PHI) (Score) 39.5 (29.4 to 54.8) 42.5 (30.0 to 53.8) 0.06
PHI density 0.77 (0.47 to 1.31) 0.88 (0.53 to 1.38) 0.16
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) ng/mL 5.6 (3.3 to 9.5) 5.6 (4.0 to 9.4) 0.22
PSA density 0.10 (0.07 to 0.17) 0.11 (0.08 to 0.21) 0.12
Biopsy Gleason Grade Group n (%)a
GG1 12 (10) 16 (18) <0.001
GG2 13 (10) 22 (24)
GG3 6 (5) 3 (3)
GG4 2 (2) 6 (7)
GG5 0 2 (2)

Data presented as n (%) of column or median (quartile).

a

Gleason Grade Group (GGx) based on 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference.