Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;16(3):258–263. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00659-y

Table 2.

Predictors associated with the esophageal stricture

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65*) (years) 0.74 (0.11–5.07) 1
Sex (male vs. female*) 0.58 (0.06–5.43) 0.653
Tumor location (Ce-Ut vs. Mt-Lt*) 1.64 (0.10–26.35) 1
Circumference (entire vs. 3/4 < *) 5.80 (0.71–76.95) 0.076 3.13 (0.34–28.7) 0.312
Size of tumor (≥ 40 vs. < 40 mm*) 0.52 (0.08–3.03) 0.460
Size of resected specimen (≥ 50 vs. < 50 mm*) 0.85 (0.14–5.09) 1
Depth of invasion (pT1b vs. pT1a*) 2.70 (0.25–38.82) 0.353
time (≥ 150 vs. < 150 min*) 1.68 (0.29–10.32) 0.700
Stricture prevention (OS vs. LSI*) 1.71 (0.18–16.12) 0.653
White coat (Thick vs. Thin-Mod*) 16.86 (1.53–930.07) 0.007 13.70 (1.22–154.00) 0.034

An asterisk was entered in the reference category for each variable to estimate the stricture odds ratio

OR Odds ratios, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, Ce cervical esophagus, Ut upper thoracic esophagus, Mt mid-thoracic esophagus, Lt lower thoracic esophagus, LSI local steroid injection, OS oral steroid, Thin-Mod thin-moderately thick white coats