Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;6(1):e001037. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001037

Table 2.

Annual stroke risk and severity by CHADS2 risk score, AF status and anticoagulant treatment received

CHADS2 score No AF AF
No treatment Aspirin No treatment Aspirin NOAC*† Warfarin*
0 0.2% 0.2% 1.1% 0.8% 0.3% 0.3%
1 0.6% 0.5% 3.1% 2.2% 0.8% 0.8%
2 1.3% 0.9% 6.3% 4.5% 1.7% 1.7%
3 2.5% 1.8% 12.0% 8.6% 3.3% 3.2%
4 3.2% 2.3% 15.3% 10.9% 4.2% 4.1%
5 3.6% 2.6% 17.2% 12.3% 4.7% 4.6%
6 4.0% 2.9% 19.2% 13.7% 5.3% 5.1%
IS severity Mild: 42%; moderate: 26%; severe: 10%; fatal: 22%

*NOAC was used as treatment in base-case analysis and warfarin was considered in sensitivity analysis.

†A class-effect for NOAC was assumed by taking the average efficacy of apixaban, dabigatran (low and high dose), rivaroxaban, edoxaban (low and high dose).11

‡IS risk was adjusted by a factor of 1.46 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.16) per decade.13

AF, atrial fibrillation;IS, ischaemic stroke;NOAC, new oral anticoagulant.