Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;10:646. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00646

Table 2.

Quantitative motor assessment—response-to-intervention analyses in PD vs. controls.

iWalk: Stride length PD (n = 18) vs. Controls (n = 17)
p-value
time
p-value
time × group
p-value
time × gait condition
p-value
time × group × gait condition
iWalk: normal pace vs. iWalk: dual-tasking (calculating + crossing)
0.09 0.040 0.07 0.36
iWalk: normal pace vs. iWalk: dual-tasking—calculating vs. iWalk: dual-tasking—crossing
0.008 0.009 0.014 0.023ϕ*

iWALK, instrumented walk; n, number; p, level of significance; PD, Parkinson's Disease. time: change from baseline to follow-up; group: PD vs. Controls; gait condition: normal pace vs. dual-tasking calculating vs. dual-tasking crosses ϕnormal pace vs. dual-tasking calculating: p = 0.036;

normal pace vs. dual-tasking crosses: p = 0.64;

*

dual-tasking calculating vs. dual-tasking crosses: p = 0.018. Bold values represent significant values.