Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;10:646. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00646

Table 3.

Cognition—Response-to-intervention analyses in PD vs. Controls.

PD n = 18 Controls n = 17 p-value group p-value time p-value time * group
D2 TEST OF ATTENTION
F% (PR)
– Baseline 58.7 (27.7) 55.9 (19.1) 0.56 0.20 0.29
– Follow-up 68.8 (22.3) 58.9 (19.6) 0.11
KL (PR)
– Baseline 27.1 (23.1) 56.1 (26.2) 0.002 0.029 0.015
– Follow-up 40.7 (23.2) 61.1 (33.5) 0.042
CVLT
Immediate recall (PR)
– Baseline 54.1 (12.1) 60.7 (11.0) 0.11 0.62 0.37
– Follow-up 56.2 (9.3) 58.7 (11.8) 0.50
Short delay free recall (PR)
– Baseline 11.4 (3.2) 12.3 (2.7) 0.51 0.78 0.09
– Follow-up 12.2 (2.5) 11.4 (3.5) 0.70
Long delay free recall (PR)
– Baseline 12.1 (2.4) 11.6 (2.7) 0.46 0.45 0.65
– Follow-up 12.5 (3.1) 11.8 (3.3) 0.70
RWT
Word fluency: lexical (2 min)
– Baseline 56.6 (28.4) 46.6 (24.3) 0.35 0.84 0.51
– Follow-up 58.6 (30.5) 51.7 (25.1) 0.33
Category change: lexical (2 min)
– Baseline 40.7 (27.9) 59.4 (22.4) 0.042 0.58 0.24
– Follow-up 52.4 (29.9) 56.9 (28.0) 0.62
Word fluency: semantic (2 min)
– Baseline 45.6 (27.2) 47.8 (25.9) 0.83 0.040 0.37
– Follow-up 53.0 (25.7) 56.1 (28.0) 0.57
Category change: semantic (2 min)
– Baseline 45.9 (30.3) 52.7 (22.5) 0.47 0.34 0.58
– Follow-up 47.9 (31.6) 60.0 (25.8) 0.23

Values are given as mean and standard deviation; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; F%, Percentage of mistakes in relation to edited signs; KL, Total of correct edited signs minus total of wrong edited signs; min, minutes; MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; n, number; p, level of significance; PD, Parkinson's Disease; PR, percentage range; RWT, Regensburger word fluency test. Bold values represent significant values.