Table 3.
Cognition—Response-to-intervention analyses in PD vs. Controls.
PD n = 18 | Controls n = 17 | p-value group | p-value time | p-value time * group | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D2 TEST OF ATTENTION | |||||
– F% (PR) | |||||
– Baseline | 58.7 (27.7) | 55.9 (19.1) | 0.56 | 0.20 | 0.29 |
– Follow-up | 68.8 (22.3) | 58.9 (19.6) | 0.11 | ||
– KL (PR) | |||||
– Baseline | 27.1 (23.1) | 56.1 (26.2) | 0.002 | 0.029 | 0.015 |
– Follow-up | 40.7 (23.2) | 61.1 (33.5) | 0.042 | ||
CVLT | |||||
– Immediate recall (PR) | |||||
– Baseline | 54.1 (12.1) | 60.7 (11.0) | 0.11 | 0.62 | 0.37 |
– Follow-up | 56.2 (9.3) | 58.7 (11.8) | 0.50 | ||
– Short delay free recall (PR) | |||||
– Baseline | 11.4 (3.2) | 12.3 (2.7) | 0.51 | 0.78 | 0.09 |
– Follow-up | 12.2 (2.5) | 11.4 (3.5) | 0.70 | ||
– Long delay free recall (PR) | |||||
– Baseline | 12.1 (2.4) | 11.6 (2.7) | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.65 |
– Follow-up | 12.5 (3.1) | 11.8 (3.3) | 0.70 | ||
RWT | |||||
– Word fluency: lexical (2 min) | |||||
– Baseline | 56.6 (28.4) | 46.6 (24.3) | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.51 |
– Follow-up | 58.6 (30.5) | 51.7 (25.1) | 0.33 | ||
– Category change: lexical (2 min) | |||||
– Baseline | 40.7 (27.9) | 59.4 (22.4) | 0.042 | 0.58 | 0.24 |
– Follow-up | 52.4 (29.9) | 56.9 (28.0) | 0.62 | ||
– Word fluency: semantic (2 min) | |||||
– Baseline | 45.6 (27.2) | 47.8 (25.9) | 0.83 | 0.040 | 0.37 |
– Follow-up | 53.0 (25.7) | 56.1 (28.0) | 0.57 | ||
– Category change: semantic (2 min) | |||||
– Baseline | 45.9 (30.3) | 52.7 (22.5) | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.58 |
– Follow-up | 47.9 (31.6) | 60.0 (25.8) | 0.23 |
Values are given as mean and standard deviation; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; F%, Percentage of mistakes in relation to edited signs; KL, Total of correct edited signs minus total of wrong edited signs; min, minutes; MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; n, number; p, level of significance; PD, Parkinson's Disease; PR, percentage range; RWT, Regensburger word fluency test. Bold values represent significant values.