Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 21;2(6):e195776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5776

Table 3. Association of Phase 3 Framingham Risk Scores (FRS) With Cerebral Blood Flow.

Model Lobe CBF
Frontal Temporal Parietal Occipital
R2, % P Value for Model B (SE) P Value for FRS R2, % P Value for Model B (SE) P Value for FRS R2, % P Value for Model B (SE) P Value for FRS R2, % P Value for Model B (SE) P Value for FRS
Model 1a 5.6 .01 −5.118 (1.968) .01b 8.5 .001 −5.063 (1.552) .001c 9.8 .001 −8.060 (2.285) .001c 17.5 <.001 −12.034 (2.448) <.001c
Model 2d 12.0 .12 −7.924 (3.188) .02b 21.6 .002c −7.198 (2.411) .004c 19.1 .006 −11.633 (3.634) .002c 26.7 <.001 −16.846 (3.872) <.001c

Abbreviation: CBF, cerebral blood flow.

a

Model 1 examined the association of log–Framingham Risk Scores at phase 3 with CBF to the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes.

b

Associations significant at uncorrected P < .05.

c

Associations statistically significant at Bonferroni-corrected P < .0125.

d

Model 2 included additional covariates: age, sex, education, cognitive status, socioeconomic status, arterial transit time, statin medication use, and units per week of alcohol consumed.