Table 3.
Time point | Two factors | Three factors | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMSEA | CFI | TLI | WRMR | RMSEA | CFI | TLI | WRMR | |
First set of CFAs—no double loadings | ||||||||
Baseline | 0.110 | 0.937 | 0.929 | 1.239 | 0.112 | 0.936 | 0.927 | 1.233 |
Week 8 | 0.107 | 0.956 | 0.950 | 1.112 | 0.109 | 0.955 | 0.949 | 1.110 |
Week 26 | 0.116 | 0.948 | 0.942 | 1.215 | 0.117 | 0.948 | 0.941 | 1.211 |
Second set of CFAs—double loadings for Items 4, 14, 15, 16 and 19 as shown in previous EFAs | ||||||||
Baseline | 0.084 | 0.965 | 0.959 | 0.940 | 0.085 | 0.964 | 0.957 | 0.937 |
Week 8 | 0.086 | 0.973 | 0.968 | 0.864 | 0.088 | 0.971 | 0.967 | 0.863 |
Week 26 | 0.082 | 0.975 | 0.971 | 0.863 | 0.083 | 0.974 | 0.970 | 0.856 |
Third set of CFAs—double loadings for Items 4, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 12 as suggested in modification | ||||||||
Baseline | 0.076 | 0.971 | 0.966 | 0.867 | 0.078 | 0.970 | 0.965 | 0.863 |
Week 8 | 0.069 | 0.982 | 0.979 | 0.742 | 0.072 | 0.981 | 0.978 | 0.741 |
Week 26 | 0.076 | 0.978 | 0.975 | 0.806 | 0.077 | 0.978 | 0.974 | 0.797 |
Note: One item (“I get frustrated choosing what to wear”) was eliminated prior to the evaluation based on qualitative data.
Abbreviations: CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; TLI, Tucker‐Lewis Index; WRMR, weighted root mean square residual.