Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;33(6):1006–1019. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15570

Table 3.

Treatment options for AGW

Treatment Mode of action Schedule Clearance rate (%) Recurrence rate (%) Advantages Disadvantages Refs
Ablative techniques
Cryotherapy Liquid nitrogen freezes and destroys lesions Applied directly to lesions; repeat for two or three cycles 46–96 18–39
  • Rapid results in some patients

  • Minimal training

  • High recurrence rate

  • Repeat physician visits

  • Pain, necrosis, hypopigmentation

20, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49
CO2 and Nd:YAG laser Laser vaporizes lesions Under local anaesthesia, protocol depends on type of laser 23–95 2.5–77
  • Rapid results

  • Effective for thick lesions

  • High recurrence rate; in some cases even before healing of laser treatment

  • Repeat physician visits

  • Costly

  • Substantial training

  • Expertise required

  • Pain/scarring

  • Smoke evacuator needed

20, 48, 50
Electrocautery High‐frequency electrical currents cause thermal damage to infected tissue Under local anaesthesia, base of lesion excised; repeat as required 35–94 20–25
  • Rapid results

  • High recurrence rate

  • Repeat physician visits

  • Expertise required

  • Smoke evacuator needed

18, 20, 49, 51
Surgery Scissor or scalpel excision Under local or general anaesthesia; base of lesion excised 89–93 18–65
  • Rapid results

  • Useful for large lesions

  • High recurrence rate

  • Pain/scarring

  • Expertise required

52, 53, 54
Trichloroacetic acid (33–50%) Acid induces a chemical burn One to three times per week; repeat as necessary 70–100 18–36
  • Rapid results

  • Suitable for a few small lesions

  • High recurrence rate

  • Repeat physician visits

  • Intense burning sensation

20, 45, 47, 55
Immunotherapies
Imiquimod 5% Immunomodulator: stimulates interferon and cytokine production Three nights per week for up to 16 weeks or longer 35–75 6
  • Efficacy

  • Simple regimen

  • Easy self‐application

  • Preferred by patients

  • Lower recurrence rates than ablative techniques

  • Inflammatory reactions extending beyond treatment area can show the infected area

  • Inflammatory reactions extending beyond treatment area

  • Response may be slow

  • Lower clearance rates than ablative techniques

  • Rare vitiligo‐like depigmentation

20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 41, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62
Imiquimod 3.75% Immunomodulator: stimulates interferon and cytokine production Once daily before bedtime for up to 8 weeks 19–37 15–19
  • Efficacy

  • Short treatment duration

  • Simple regimen

  • Easy self‐application

  • Inflammatory reactions extending beyond treatment area can show the infected area

  • Inflammatory reactions extending beyond treatment area

  • Response may be slow

20, 27, 28, 29
Sinecatechins 10% and 15% Inflammatory response modulator Three times daily for up to 16 weeks 40–81% 7–12
  • Efficacy

  • Self‐application

  • Lower recurrence rates than ablative techniques

  • Intense application site reactions

  • Lower clearance rates than ablative techniques

  • Repeat 3 times daily administration may affect adherence

  • Need for sanitary pads

20, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
Other topical therapy
Podophyllotoxin 0.5% (alcoholic solution) 0.15% (cream) Antimitotic agent induces tissue necrosis Twice‐daily to affected areas for 3 consecutive days per week; discontinue for 4 days; repeat for up to 4 weeks 45–94 11–100
  • Efficacy

  • Easy self‐application

  • High recurrence rate

  • Complicated regimen

  • Intense application site reactions

20, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 63
Nitric–zinc complex topical solution Induces a caustic effect on the wart through mummification and protein denaturation/coagulation action Once or up to four times; repeat at 2‐week intervals if needed 90–99 Not evaluated
  • Efficacy

  • Easy application

  • Current evidence in AGW available from a limited number of patients only

  • Investigation of recurrence rate is required

64

AGW, anogenital warts.