Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;38(4):435–442. doi: 10.1111/dar.12922

Table 1.

Mean (SD) Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) domain and total scores for the total sample and per primary‐problem substance. Post‐hoc gives a description of significant differencesa

Cognitive domain (score range) Total
(n = 656)
Alcohol (A)
(n = 391)
Cannabis (C)
(n = 123)
Stimulants (S)
(n = 100)
Opioids (O)
(n = 26)
P value Post‐hoc
Executive functioning (0–2) 1.31 (0.67) 1.27 (0.68) 1.45 (0.66) 1.34 (0.66) 1.12 (0.77) 0.04
Visuospatial abilities (0–4) 2.77 (0.94) 2.73 (0.95) 2.91 (0.90) 2.88 (0.88) 2.27 (1.00) <0.01 C, S > O
Attention (0–6) 5.40 (0.97) 5.44 (0.95) 5.42 (0.92) 5.40 (0.90) 5.23 (1.31) 0.74
Language (0–5) 4.46 (0.72) 4.44 (0.76) 4.48 (0.67) 4.51 (0.70) 4.58 (0.64) 0.68
Abstract reasoning (0–2) 1.52 (0.63) 1.51 (0.64) 1.58 (0.60) 1.51 (0.58) 1.65 (0.63) 0.55
Memory (0–5) 3.30 (1.49) 3.21 (1.56) 3.65 (1.24) 3.33 (1.33) 2.69 (1.72) 0.01 A < C
Orientation (0–6) 5.75 (0.61) 5.76 (0.62) 5.74 (0.54) 5.79 (0.54) 5.77 (0.65) 0.94
MoCA total (0−30) 25.52 (3.12) 25.30 (3.23) 26.33 (2.69) 25.86 (2.72) 24.69 (3.88) <0.01 A < C
n (%) scoring below cut‐off 206 (31) 134 (34) 26 (21) 27 (27) 10 (38) 0.03 A > C
a

Patients with sedatives or gamma‐hydroxybutyrate as the primary‐problem substance are only included in the total sample and not separately described.