Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2019 Mar 26;125(12):2027–2038. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32025

Table 3.

Distribution of type of first disease progression by risk-group

First progression event Low-risk Intermediate-risk High-risk
RTOG-0129* (n=123) (n=73) (n=64)

Locoregional 10 (8.1%) 14 (19.2%) 21 (32.8%)
Distant (± locoregional) 10 (8.1%) 12 (16.4%) 11 (17.2%)
Any 20 (16.3%) 26 (35.6%) 32 (50.0%)

RTOG-0522 (n=140) (n=93) (n=54)

Locoregional 20 (14.3%) 11 (11.8%) 10 (18.5%)
Distant (± locoregional) 9 (6.4%) 18 (19.4%) 11 (20.4%)
Any 29 (20.7%) 29 (31.2%) 21 (38.9%)

Overall£ (n=263) (n=166) (n=118)

Locoregional 30 (11.4%) 25 (15.1%) 31 (26.3%)
Distant (± locoregional) 19 (7.2%) 30 (18.1%) 22 (18.6%)
Any 49 (18.6%) 55 (33.1%) 53 (44.9%)
*

Among RTOG-10129 participants with recurrence (e.g. restricting analysis to those who have disease progression), there was no difference in distribution of locoregional vs. distant failures (±locoregional) by risk groups (p=0.48).

Among participants with recurrence in RTOG-0522 (e.g. restricting analysis to those who have disease progression), when considering distribution for type of first failure there was a non-significant increase in locoregional failure in the low-risk group as compared with the intermediate- and high- risk groups (p=0.05).

£

When considering the distribution of first disease progression among participants with recurrence in the overall study population (RTOG-0129 and RTOG-0522) by risk group there was no difference in distribution of locoregional or distant failures by risk groups (p=0.22).