Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;106(5):596–605. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11094

Table 1.

Patient and tumour characteristics

Hospital 1 (n = 32) Hospital 2 (n = 19) Total (n = 51)
Age (years) * 64 (53–72) 64 (60–68) 64 (56–72)
Sex ratio (M : F) 23 : 9 16 : 3 39 : 12
Tumour location
Upper oesophageal 0 1 1 (2)
Middle oesophageal 3 3 6 (12)
Lower oesophageal 15 11 26 (51)
Gastro‐oesophageal junction 14 4 18 (35)
Histological tumour type
Adenocarcinoma 28 14 42 (82)
Squamous cell carcinoma 4 5 9 (18)
Grade of differentiation
Well differentiated 2 0 2 (4)
Moderately differentiated 15 10 25 (49)
Poorly differentiated 14 3 17 (33)
Undifferentiated 0 2 2 (4)
Unknown 1 4 5 (10)
Clinical T category
cT1 1 0 1 (2)
cT2 8 4 12 (24)
cT3 23 14 37 (73)
cT4a 0 1 1 (2)
Clinical N category
cN0 15 4 19 (37)
cN1 6 8 14 (27)
cN2 9 7 16 (31)
cN3 2 0 2 (4)
Radicality of resection
R0 32 18 50 (98)
R1 0 1 1 (2)
Mandard grade
TRG 1 6 6 12 (24)
TRG 2 10 7 17 (33)
TRG 3 12 4 16 (31)
TRG 4 3 1 4 (8)
TRG 5 1 1 2 (4)

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise;

*

values are median (i.q.r.).

According to the seventh edition of the TNM classification32. Hospital 1, Netherlands Cancer Institute; hospital 2, University Medical Center Utrecht. TRG, tumour regression grade.