Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018 Jul 20;9(6):1499–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.07.009

Table 1.

Number of nymphs testing positive for each of seven pathogens, statewide nymphal infection prevalence (NIP) and associated 95% confidence intervals calculated using maximum likelihood, Minnesota, May 31–June 30, 2015.

No. positive sitesa (%) No. positive ticks (%)b NIP (95% CI)
Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto 53 (83) 313 (25.24) 25.24 (22.88–27.72)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum 28 (44) 78 (6.29) 6.29 (5.04–7.75)
Babesia microti 27 (42) 58 (4.68) 4.68 (3.60–5.96)
Ehrlichia muris subsp. eauclairensis 13 (20) 16 (1.29) 1.29 (0.77–2.04)
Borrelia miyamotoi 10 (16) 13 (1.05) 1.05 (0.59–1.74)
Borrelia mayonii 7 (11) 8 (0.65) 0.65 (0.30–1.22)
Powassan virusc 4 (6) 6 (0.49) 0.48 (0.20–1.00)
a

The total number of collection sites where nymphs were recovered was 64.

b

The total number of nymphal ticks collected from 64 sites was 1240.

c

The total number of ticks tested for Powassan virus lineage II was 1233.