TABLE 4.
Frequency and percentage of categories of influence by number of influences provided by participant.
|
WN |
WB |
C |
U |
||||||
| No. inf. | n | f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % |
| 1 | 68 | 17 | 25.00% | 5 | 44 | 64.71% | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 2 | 59 | 20 | 16.95% | 14 | 84 | 71.19% | 0 | 0% | |
| 3 | 57 | 21 | 12.28% | 23 | 126 | 73.68% | 1 | 0.58% | |
| 4 | 40 | 20 | 12.50% | 15 | 123 | 76.88% | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 5 | 18 | 11 | 12.22% | 9 | 70 | 77.78% | 0 | 0% | |
| 6–15 | 20 | 18 | 11.92% | 15 | 117 | 77.48% | 1 | 6.62% | |
| Total (758) | 262 | 107 | 14.12% | 81 | 10.69% | 564 | 74.41% | 6 | 0.79% |
| 95% CI | [11.64, 16.59] | [8.49, 12.88] | [71.30, 77.51] | [0.16, 1.42] | |||||
Table shows the number of participants who provided a given number of influences. 95% confidence interval for total percentages are in square brackets (Study 2). Table shows the occurrence of categories of influence for groups who listed the same number of influences, up to five influences. E.g., in the third row, 57 individuals provided 3 influences, 57*3 = 171 influences for that row. No. inf., number of influences; f, frequency; CI, confidence interval; WN, within-domain narrow; WB, within-domain broad; C, cross-domain; U, uncertain. Total number of influences for each category as a percentage of the total number of influences for all categories is indicated in bold.