Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;41(7):1559–1572. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2840695

TABLE 3. Quantitative Comparison of Different Networks and CRFs in Stage 1 of 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Method Dice (%) ASSD (pixels)
DeepMedic [15] 83.87 Inline graphic± 8.72 2.38 Inline graphic± 1.52
HighRes3DNet [14] 85.47 Inline graphic± 8.66 2.20 Inline graphic± 2.24
3D P-Net(b5) 85.36 Inline graphic± 7.34 2.21 Inline graphic± 2.13
3D P-Net 86.68 Inline graphic± 7.67 2.14 Inline graphic± 2.17
3D P-Net + Dense CRF 87.06 Inline graphic± 7.23 2.10 Inline graphic± 2.02
3D P-Net + CRF-Net(f) 87.55 Inline graphic± 6.72 2.04 Inline graphic± 1.70

Significant improvement from 3D P-Net (Inline graphicp-value Inline graphic< 0.05) is shown in bold font.