Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;41(7):1559–1572. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2840695

TABLE 4. Quantitative Comparison of Different Refinement Methods in Stage 2 of 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Method Dice(%) ASSD(pixels)
Before refinement 87.55 Inline graphic± 6.72 2.04 Inline graphic± 1.70
Min-cut user-editing 88.41 Inline graphic± 7.05 1.74 Inline graphic± 1.53
3D R-Net(Euc) 88.82 Inline graphic± 7.68 1.60 Inline graphic± 1.56
3D R-Net 89.30 Inline graphic± 6.82 1.52 Inline graphic± 1.37
3D R-Net(Euc) + CRF-Net(fu) 89.27 Inline graphic± 7.32 1.48 Inline graphic± 1.22
3D R-Net + CRF-Net(fu) 89.93 Inline graphic± 6.49 1.43 Inline graphic± 1.16

The segmentation before refinement is obtained by 3D P-Net + CRF-Net(f). 3D R-Net(Euc) uses euclidean distance instead of geodesic distance. Significant improvement from 3D R-Net (Inline graphicp-value Inline graphic< 0.05) is shown in bold font.