TABLE 4. Quantitative Comparison of Different Refinement Methods in Stage 2 of 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation.
Method | Dice(%) | ASSD(pixels) |
---|---|---|
Before refinement | 87.55 6.72 | 2.04 1.70 |
Min-cut user-editing | 88.41 7.05 | 1.74 1.53 |
3D R-Net(Euc) | 88.82 7.68 | 1.60 1.56 |
3D R-Net | 89.30 6.82 | 1.52 1.37 |
3D R-Net(Euc) + CRF-Net(fu) | 89.27 7.32 | 1.48 1.22 |
3D R-Net + CRF-Net(fu) | 89.93 6.49 | 1.43 1.16 |
The segmentation before refinement is obtained by 3D P-Net + CRF-Net(f). 3D R-Net(Euc) uses euclidean distance instead of geodesic distance. Significant improvement from 3D R-Net (-value 0.05) is shown in bold font.