. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 26.

Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2018 Dec 17;2018:2090–2099. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00223

Table 5.

Results of alternative methods that use unlabeled images

AU	F1			S score
AU	GFK ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \end{matrix}}$	LapSVM ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \\ ulb 10 k \end{matrix}}$	TSVM ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \\ ulb 25 k \end{matrix}}$	GFK ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \end{matrix}}$	LapSVM ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \\ ulb 10 k \end{matrix}}$	TSVM ${\begin{matrix} g t 25 k \\ ulb 25 k \end{matrix}}$
1	19.3	1.2	24.1	66.1	82.3	70.2
4	31.0	25.7	32.3	61.1	85.3	62.5
5	31.8	23.1	40.3	61.1	60.7	80.6
6	73.8	58.3	75.7	71.7	70.0	79.1
12	85.1	57.7	87.4	75.5	50.9	80.2
25	85.8	88.9	88.2	72.4	79.4	78.5
26	39.0	5.0	47.0	69.5	83.2	78.4
Avg.	52.2	37.0	56.4	68.2	73.1	75.6