Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev Appl. 2019 Mar 12;11(3):034029. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034029

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

Data processing. (a) Fluorescence images are acquired at each of 32 different microwave frequencies (16 frequencies for each of the f± spin transitions). (b) For any given pixel, two 16-point ODMR curves (fluorescence intensity versus microwave frequency)are generated. Each ODMR curve is fit to a Lorentzian function to reveal the ODMR central frequencies for that pixel. This is repeated for each pixel, yielding two maps of ODMR central frequencies corresponding to f+ and f. (c) The magnetic field pattern is obtained by subtraction of the images for f+ and f, division by 2γNV, and subtraction of the applied B0 field. (d) An example fluorescence image for a fixed microwave frequency along with a bright-field transmission image of the same field of view. (e) Intermediate step showing separate maps for frequencies f+ and f. (f) The final taken at B0 = 350 mT, is proportional to stray magnetic fields, γNVBx =(f+f)/2 − γNVB0. This is shown alongside a map of residual nonmagnetic shifts, (f+ f)/2 − 2D. Note that f is defined such that it is negative when | −1〉 is lower in energy than |0〉. The horizontally varying pattern is an artifact of the sCMOS camera’s read-out dual-sensor This artifact is present when rolling-shutter mode is used, but is eliminated by our subtraction procedure.