Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Aug 1;81(4):395–405. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002042

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

PrEP Eligibility According to 2017 CDC Criteria Among Subgroups of Women in Reporting Various Risk Indicators.

aEligibility assessment assumed all participants were NOT in a high-prevalence area or network. If all participants were assumed to be in a high-prevalence area or network, 100% would be eligible based on guidance summary criteria for all risk indicators.

bA total of 349 participants responded to survey items corresponding to the "experienced intimate partner violence" risk indicator because only participants who reported having sex with men (or both men and women) and having a current sexual/romantic relationship for 1+ year (n = 357) were gated to those items (and 8 responses were missing). For ail risk indicators besides the "experienced intimate partner violence" risk indicator, the total number of participants who responded to corresponding survey items ranged from 651-679 due to survey gating/display logic, missing responses, and exclusion of "prefer not to say" responses. (See Appendix 1 for description of gating/display logic and Appendix 2: eTable 1 for total n per risk indicator).

cPotentially viremic = not virally suppressed or viral suppression status unknown to participant