Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;311(6):469–475. doi: 10.1007/s00403-019-01922-z

Table 2.

Summary of results of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for earlobe keloids

References No. of patents No. of keloids Total dose (Gy) Fraction scheme (Gy) BED(Gy) (α/β = 10) Median follow-up (range) (Mos) LC rate (%) S and R interval
HDR brachytherapy
 Garg et al. [10] 12 Earlobe

17

8

15 3 × 5 22.5 26 (12–71)

88.2

87.5

24 h
 Arneja et al. [1] 25 15 3 × 5 22.5 35 (mean) (24–57) 92 1 h
 Van et al. [27] 28 Earlobe

32

37%

12 2 × 6 19.2 33.6

96.9

4 h
 Hafkamp et al. [12] 24 Ear

29

14

13 1 × 13 29.9 53 (19–95)

75.9

85.7

2 h
 Jiang et al. [14] 29 37 18 3 × 6 28.8 49.7 (7.9–91.9) 91.9 6 h
Electronic radiotherapy
 Present study 23 Earlobe 30 15 3 × 5 22.5 26 (14–93) 86.7 2 h
 Ogawa et al. [20]

39

106

47

127

15

10

3 × 5

2 × 5

22.5

15

18

95.7

94.5

 Song et al. [26] 12 Earlobe

16

8

10 1 × 10 20 20 (mean)

100

100

72 h
 Vila et al. [30] 19 Earlobe

20

10

15 3 × 5 22.5 40 (12–68)

76.5

80

4 h
 Kim et al. [16] 27 Earlobe

13

25

12

15

3 × 4

3 × 5

16.8

22.5

132 (132–106)

49.3 (15–124)

76.9

93.7

24 h
 Shen et al. [24] 568 Earlobe

834

239

18 2 × 9 34.2 40 (12–160)

88.3

96.7

24–48 h

BED biologic equivalent dose, Mos months, LC local control, S surgery, R radiotherapy, HDR high dose rate