Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 26;11(3):422–430. doi: 10.1111/os.12493

Table 3.

Summary of 11 patients with positive LGDT sign

No. Age (years) Sex Time from injury to surgery (weeks) PLC injury pattern F/U time (months) ΔPTT ΔER Pre‐op Lysholm Post‐op Lysholm Pre‐op Tegner Post‐op Tegner Pre‐op IKDC Post‐op IKDC
1 25 M 2.0 B 37 18.5 8.0 17 55 2.0 1.0 21 57
2 26 M 3.0 C 29 15.6 9.0 80 61 2.0 2.0 12 49
3 39 M 3.0 C 33 3.5 10.1 32 67 2.0 1.0 34 66
4 26 M 2.0 B 25 11.1 2.0 35 59 1.0 2.0 22 42
5 36 M 1.0 A 29 13.0 4.0 85 64 1.0 1.0 21 37
6 35 F 78.0 A 27 6.9 14.0 45 60 3.0 1.0 27 71
7 38 F 3.0 A 25 9.9 10.2 52 58 3.0 1.0 27 31
8 26 F 24.0 C 43 4.3 10.6 36 53 3.0 1.0 42 58
9 33 F 12.0 A 28 9.9 6.0 28 66 0.0 2.0 41 70
10 35 F 16.0 B 27 5.2 12.3 76 76 0.0 2.0 32 76
11 29 F 24.0 C 32 17.5 22.0 53 55 0.0 2.0 28 68

F, female; F/U, follow‐up; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; LGDT, lateral gutter drive‐through; M, male; PLC, posterolateral corner; ΔER, side‐to‐side difference of tibial external rotation; ΔPTT, side‐to‐side difference of posterior tibial translation