Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun;109(Suppl 3):S205–S213. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305082

TABLE 3—

Odds Ratios for Likelihood of Remission by Intervention Status (4-Year Sample n = 283): Community Partners in Care, Los Angeles County, California, 2010–2016

Secondary Analyses, Adjusted for Social Determinants, Self-Efficacy, Social Context, and Clinical Status (Full Sample) Clinical Remission (n = 130), OR (95% CI) Community-Defined Remission (n = 227), OR (95% CI)
Model 1: intervention status (CEP vs RS) 1.91 (1.11, 3.28) 2.68 (1.32, 5.42)
Model 2: final model
 Intervention (CEP vs RS) 1.73 (1.01, 2.99) 2.43 (1.17, 5.02)
 Depression treatment self-efficacy 1.13 (1.00, 1.28) 1.14 (1.02, 1.27)
 Someone to have a good time with (social support) 1.13 (0.94, 1.36) 1.26 (1.00, 1.59)
 ≥ 3 chronic medical conditions of 18 0.46 (0.27, 0.79) 0.85 (0.37, 1.97)

Note. CEP = Community Engagement and Planning; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; RS = Resources for Services. Data were multiply imputed and weighted for eligible sample for enrollment and accounted for the design effect of the cluster randomization.