Table 2.
Number of DEGs and enriched GO terms of the major biological process classes in the comparisons “noSt vs. HSt” and “noSt vs. FDSt” within each grapevine cultivar
| noSt vs. HSt | noSt vs. FDSt | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chardonnay | Tocai friulano | Chardonnay | Tocai friulano | |||||
| 3 dpi | 6 dpi | 3 dpi | 6 dpi | 3 dpi | 6 dpi | 3 dpi | 6 dpi | |
| n. DEGs | 1656 | 526 | 815 | 949 | 460 | 1471 | 1735 | 1713 |
| n. DEGs up-regulated | 977 | 160 | 446 | 467 | 242 | 795 | 799 | 853 |
| n. DEGs down-regulated | 679 | 366 | 369 | 482 | 218 | 676 | 936 | 860 |
| n. enriched GO terms (BP) | 57 | 119 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 121 | 118 | 68 |