Figure 6.

Family support significantly moderated links between election distress and depression symptoms for affected individuals. Analyses used a bootstrapping approach with 5000 samples, and significance was determined at 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals. All variables were continuous and centered before analysis, and the estimated effects are reported as unstandardized regression coefficients. A, Distribution by group of family support. Family support did not differ by group. B, Significant moderation analysis. Family support significantly moderated links between election distress and depression symptoms for affected individuals. C, Simple slope analyses showing that high family support ameliorated the relationship between election distress and depression symptoms for affected individuals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.