Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;38(17):4163–4185. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3152-17.2018

Table 1.

Summary of units and performance

Tactile task (delay 1.2 s) Auditory task (delay 1.2 s) Auditory task (delay 2.0 s)
Mice 7 6 6
Recording sessions 30 37 20
Recording sessions for session-based analysisa 19 31 20
Units 566 639 755
Putative pyramidal cells 471 539 667
Putative FS neurons 77 85 74
Selective pyramidal cells (Fig. 5a–c) 431 (91.5% of pyramidal cells) 478 (88.7% of pyramidal cells) 618 (92.7% of pyramidal cells)
Delay-selective cells Fig. 6a–c, top, middle) 324 (68.8% of pyramidal cells) 340 (63.1% of pyramidal cells) 422 (63.3% of pyramidal cells)
Behavioral performanceb
    Mean ± SD 80.3 ± 10.1% 91.4 ± 7.0% 87.2 ± 8.4%
    Range 60.3–93.4% 69.2–99.7% 73.6–98.7%
Early lick rateb 5.7 ± 5.1% (mean ± SD) 9.5 ± 9.4% (mean ± SD) 5.4 ± 3.5% (mean ± SD)
Reaction timec 264 ± 109 ms (mean ± SD) 257 ± 99 ms (mean ± SD) 327 ± 101 ms (mean ± SD)
Trialsb 357 ± 71 (mean ± SD) 343 ± 132 (mean ± SD) 307 ± 55 (mean ± SD)
Recording depth 397–985 μm (5–95 percentile) 389–946 μm (5–95 percentile) 365–984 μm (5–95 percentile)

aFor session-based analysis (Figs. 15,16), recording sessions with >5 simultaneously recorded pyramidal cells were analyzed.

bBehavioral performance, early lick rates, reaction time, and trial number were calculated based on behavioral sessions. In some cases (8 sessions in auditory tasks with 1.2 s delay), we moved the recording probes within a behavioral session to record units from different depths. In this case we scored two recording sessions per behavioral session.

cReaction time was not significantly different among task types. p value without Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison: 0.9670 for comparison between tactile task and auditory task (1.2 s delay); 0.0415 for comparison between tactile task and auditory task (2.0 s delay), based on Mann-Whitney U test.