Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;38(37):7952–7968. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3327-17.2018

Table 3.

DDM posterior estimates and convergence for Model M2 with stimulus-locked ERP dataa

Parameter Mean SD
Drift (v), Intercept −2.004 0.057
Drift (v), ERP −0.049 0.010
Drift (v), ERP HealthOwn 0.000 0.005
Drift (v), ERP HealthSimilar −0.003 0.004
Drift (v), ERP HealthDissimilar 0.017 0.004
Drift (v), ERP TasteOwn 0.028 0.004
Drift (v), ERP TasteSimilar 0.023 0.004
Drift (v), ERP TasteDissimilar −0.001 0.004
Drift (v), HealthOwn 0.054 0.011
Drift (v), HealthSimilar 0.179 0.011
Drift (v), HealthDissimilar 0.672 0.011
Drift (v), TasteOwn 0.734 0.011
Drift (v), TasteSimilar 0.675 0.010
Drift (v), TasteDissimilar −0.006 0.010
Barrier (a), Intercept 2.000 0.043
Barrier (a), Similar 0.118 0.016
Barrier (a), Dissimilar 0.043 0.016
Starting point (z) 0.494 0.006
NonDecisionTime 0.360 0.025
Convergence
     1.0006 0.0010

aStatistics for parameter estimates reflect the mean ± SD of the N = 10,000 posterior samples of group-level parameters.