Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;38(47):10114–10128. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1597-18.2018

Table 2.

Brain regions showing lower activity for trained compared with untrained sequences posttraining

Anatomical location Cytoarchitectonic location Peak MNI coordinates Cluster level
Voxel level
x y z Voxels PFWE-corr PFWE-corr t14
R SPL 7A 22 −68 56 1710 <0.001 0.007 9.43
R Precuneus 10 −58 48 0.068 7.86
L Intraparietal sulcus hIP3 −28 −50 40 0.210 7.16
R PMd, Superior frontal gyrus 30 −4 58 610 <0.001 0.049 8.07
R PMd, Precentral gyrus 28 −6 50 0.066 7.88
R PMd, Posterior-medial frontal cortex 16 −4 62 0.979 5.09
L PMv, Inferior frontal gyrus (opercularis) Area 44 −44 2 24 372 <0.001 0.708 5.94
L PMv, Inferior frontal gyrus (opercularis) Area 44 −56 8 10 0.891 5.50
L PMv, Precentral gyrus Area 44 −50 6 20 0.958 5.24
L PMd, Superior frontal gyrus −24 −4 60 321 <0.001 0.044 8.14
L PMd, Middle frontal gyrus −24 −6 50 0.814 5.71
L PMd, Middle frontal gyrus −12 −4 58 0.994 4.88

Results are thresholded at a single voxel level, p < 0.001, k = 10 voxels. Only clusters with cluster FWE-corrected significance at p < 0.05 are shown and up to three local maxima when a cluster has multiple peaks more than 8 mm apart. Highest peaks within each cluster selected for ROI analyses are shown in bold.

The opposite contrast (posttrained > post-untrained) did not result in any significant clusters.