Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;37(21):5334–5344. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

fMRI data: differential cue-predictability-dependent effects for spatial attention and motor intention. A, Results of the first planned interaction contrast (spatial attention [invalid > valid] > motor intention [invalid > valid]): increasing BOLD responses in invalid trials and unmodulated BOLD responses in valid trials with higher values of model-derived cue predictability μ̂1(t) in the right TPJ in the spatial attention task (blue) compared with the motor intention task (green). B, Results of the second planned interaction contrast (motor intention [invalid > valid] > spatial attention [invalid > valid]): increasing BOLD responses in invalid trials and decreased or unmodulated BOLD responses with higher values of model-derived cue predictability μ̂1(t) in valid trials in the left ANG and left ACC in the motor intention task (green) compared with the spatial attention task (blue). L, Left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere.