Skip to main content
. 2017 May 31;37(22):5562–5573. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0329-17.2017

Table 2.

Effects of losartan and divalinal on cerebrovascular responses in WT and APP mice

WT WT-L WT-LD APP APP-L APP-LD
ACh
    EAmax 43.0 ± 2.0 40.6 ± 3.9 41.8 ± 2.6 28.2 ± 2.5* 41.1 ± 4.5 24.1 ± 2.5**★★
    pD2 7.3 ± 0.1 7.9 ± 0.2 8.0 ± 0.2 7.9 ± 0.2 7.8 ± 0.2 7.3 ± 0.2
CGRP
    EAmax 43.2 ± 1.9 42.0 ± 3.5 43.8 ± 5.3 26.9 ± 1.6* 40.3 ± 4.1 25.2 ± 2.2*
    pD2 8.5 ± 0.1 8.0 ± 0.2 8.3 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.2 8.1 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.1
GSK
    EAmax 51.2 ± 3.0 NA NA 27.7 ± 2.5* 52.2 ± 2.0 35.9 ± 1.8
    pD2 7.6 ± 0.2 7.5 ± 0.4 7.9 ± 0.2 8.0 ± 0.2
LEV
    EAmax 54.2 ± 2.7 NA NA 29.1 ± 3.9**★★ 51.0 ± 2.1 44.6 ± 2.3
    pD2 7.4 ± 0.2 8.2 ± 0.6 7.9 ± 0.2 7.5 ± 0.2
L-NNA
    EAmax 59.0 ± 3.2 53.1 ± 4.2 57.1 ± 2.1 79.6 ± 0.8***★★★ 59.3 ± 4.1 72.6 ± 1.1*★★

Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4–6 mice per group) and are expressed as the EAmax or pD2. EAmax is the percentage maximal dilation of ACh, CGRP, GSK, and LEV and the percentage maximal decrease after 35 min of NOS inhibition with 10−5 m L-NNA.

*★p < 0.05;

**★★p < 0.01,

***★★★p < 0.001 compared with WT control mice (*) or APP-losartan-treated mice (★) using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc multiple-comparisons tests.

L, Losartan; LD, L-divalinal; NA, not applicable.