Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371–382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Model comparisons. A, Comparison of choice frequencies and model predictions for targets, competitors, and decoys. B, Results of the first generalization test (i.e., generalizing from two-alternative to all three-alternative choice trials). Left and right panels show results for the training and test datasets, respectively. Within each panel, average BICs/deviances per model are shown on the left and evidence for the best model for each participant are shown on the right. Lower BICs/deviances indicate better fits. Dashed line indicates the fit of a baseline model that “guesses” each choice with equal probability. C, Results for the second generalization test (i.e., generalizing from trials with an N option to trials with a decoy option). HD, Hyperbolic discounting model; ED, exponential discounting model.