Table 8.

Results of the HLM analysis predicting psychological functioning from the three identified connectivity profiles and their interaction with age^a

Fixed effect	Coefficient	SE	t ratio	p
Intercept, γ00	0.016	0.050	0.328	0.743
Sex, γ01	−0.032	0.070	−0.455	0.649
Age, γ02	−0.068	0.035	−1.921	0.056
Handedness, γ03	0.032	0.036	0.889	0.374
Years of education, γ04	−0.141	0.038	−3.741	<0.001
Global connectivity Two-back, γ05	0.009	0.105	0.087	0.931
Global connectivity Zero-back, γ06	0.001	0.075	0.008	0.994
Global connectivity Loss, γ07	−0.197	0.124	−1.589	0.113
Global connectivity Random, γ08	−0.076	0.083	−0.920	0.358
Global connectivity Gain, γ09	0.023	0.099	0.229	0.819
Global connectivity Social, γ010	0.126	0.102	1.238	0.216
No. of communities (social-affective), γ011	−0.004	0.036	−0.105	0.916
No. of communities (cognitive), γ012	0.001	0.032	0.037	0.971
No. of communities Two-back, γ013	0.087	0.102	0.852	0.395
No. of communities Zero-back, γ014	0.013	0.071	0.178	0.859
No. of communities Loss, γ015	0.118	0.125	0.942	0.347
No. of communities Random, γ016	0.084	0.079	1.062	0.289
No. of communities Gain, γ017	−0.042	0.092	−0.458	0.648
No. of communities Social, γ018	−0.113	0.101	−1.119	0.264
Dynamic connectivity scores, γ019	0.010	0.040	0.252	0.801
Static connectivity Mode 1 scores, γ020	−0.019	0.039	−0.486	0.627
Static connectivity Mode 2 scores, γ021	−0.034	0.033	−1.028	0.305
Dynamic connectivity scores × Age, γ022	−0.014	0.036	−0.376	0.707
Static connectivity Mode 1 scores × Age, γ023	−0.018	0.032	−0.559	0.577
Static connectivity Mode 2 scores × Age, γ024	−0.074	0.027	−2.716	0.007

^aApproximate df for all coefficients = 334.