Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):3018–3029. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3320-16.2017

Table 1.

Mean and SEM levels of freezing behavior prior to CS presentations in each experiment

Experiment Group Training Test Extinction Test ABB Test ABA
Experiment 1 Lever 0.4 (0.4) 1.0 (0.4)
None 0.0 (0.0) 1.7 (1.0)
Experiment 2 Lever-eYFP 2.9 (1.4) 4.6 (1.7)
Lever-Hm4Di 2.6 (1.2) 5.7 (2.5)
Lever+-eYFP 0.2 (0.2) 0.0 (0.0)
Lever+-hM4Di 0.8 (0.4) 1.7 (1.0)
Experiment 3
    Stage I eYFP 0.8 (0.4) 2.1 (1.3)
hM4Di 3.1 (1.8) 6.3 (2.9)
    Stage II eYFP 1.0 (0.0) 1.5 (1.5)
hM4Di 2.0 (0.0) 1.0 (0.5)
Experiment 4 Sated-eYFP 4.4 (2.9) 63.3 (10.2)
Sated-hM4Di 1.3 (0.8) 53.5 (13.0)
Hungry-eYFP 0.4 (0.4) 60.6 (14.1)
Hungry-hM4Di 0.0 (0.0) 50.0 (12.4)
Experiment 5 eYFP 10.4 (8.8) 1.3 (0.9) 11.3 (5.1) 2.9 (0.8)
hM4Di 4.4 (3.1) 2.1 (1.9) 6.3 (2.7) 3.3 (3.1)