Table 1.

Brain regions that showed stronger activation in the trials in which participants made more fixations

Cluster	Anatomical areas	Cluster size	t value	p value	MNI coordinates
					x	y	z
1	Calcarine_R	8035	7.57	0.0000	24	−94	2
2	Frontal_Inf_Tri_R	260	5.57	0.0000	40	34	8
3	Cingulum_Mid_R	51	5.39	0.0000	6	−2	26
4	Fusiform_L	63	5.16	0.0000	−34	−40	−22
5	Hippocampus_L	473	5.02	0.0000	−18	−6	−20
6	Frontal_Mid_Orb_R	136	4.61	0.0001	32	42	−10
7	ParaHippocampal_R	19	4.45	0.0001	16	−6	−22
8	Precentral_R	20	4.41	0.0002	36	−14	68
9	Cerebelum_7b_L	40	4.34	0.0002	−26	−72	−48
10	Vermis_7	35	4.30	0.0002	4	−72	−24
11	Cerebelum_9_R	64	4.25	0.0002	16	−46	−42
12	Temporal_Sup_L	16	4.21	0.0002	−58	−18	4
13	Frontal_Inf_Orb_L	97	4.20	0.0002	−36	38	−16
14	Paracentral_Lobule_L	43	4.19	0.0002	−8	−22	56
15	Fusiform_L	12	4.16	0.0003	−38	−16	−22
16	Hippocampus_R	44	4.08	0.0003	20	−34	−2
17	Frontal_Inf_Oper_R	91	4.03	0.0004	46	8	26
18	Parietal_Inf_R	50	3.97	0.0004	30	−52	48
19	Cerebelum_Crus2_L	81	3.95	0.0004	−4	−82	−36
20	Thalamus_L	11	3.93	0.0005	−8	−26	10
21	Frontal_Inf_Tri_L	61	3.90	0.0005	−40	30	12
22	ParaHippocampal_R	37	3.83	0.0006	22	−14	−18
23	Precentral_R	32	3.60	0.0010	58	−10	46
24	Calcarine_L	24	3.56	0.0010	−6	−96	10
25	Cerebelum_9_L	26	3.51	0.0012	−6	−62	−44
26	Cerebelum_Crus2_R	13	3.40	0.0015	10	−78	−34
27	Occipital_Mid_R	19	3.37	0.0016	30	−64	36
28	Frontal_Inf_Tri_L	14	3.25	0.0021	−46	20	30

All clusters survived the threshold of p < 0.005, with 10 voxel extension, no correction, to facilitate future meta-analysis (Lieberman and Cunningham, 2009). The names of the anatomical regions in the table were obtained using the automated anatomical labeling toolbox for SPM (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002).

R/L, Right/left hemisphere; Tri, triangularis; Mid, middle; Sup, superior; Inf, inferior; Orb, orbital; Oper, opercular.