Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 27;37(39):9424–9437. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0731-17.2017

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Comparison of spatiotemporal selectivity of HVAs between developing and adult mice. A, Comparisons of preferred SPF between developing and adult mice in individual areas. Preferred SPF of areas LM and AL increased significantly with age (one-way ANOVA, LM: F(3,22) = 6.75, p < 0.003; AL: F(3,22) = 4.07, p < 0.02; post hoc Tukey's HSD test, p < 0.05). B, Comparisons of the preferred TF between developing and adult mice in individual areas. C, D, SDs of preferred SPF and TF. E, F, Comparison of preferred SPF and TF between HVAs. HVAs are listed in descending or ascending order of adult data in preferred SPF (E) or preferred TF (F), respectively. Bottom statistical panels are the same as those shown in Figure 6, D–G. G, H, Comparisons of inter-areal Mahalanobis distances among the four time points. The distances between HVAs were short at EO1 and P20 and increased at P25 (G). In all HVA pairs, the inter-areal distances at EO1 and P20 were significantly shorter than those in P25 and adult mice (H; one-way ANOVA, F(3,125) = 9.88, p < 10−5; post hoc Tukey's HSD test, p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.