Table 2.

Statistical table of CPA treatment in Figure 8

	Figure 8A			Fig. 8C			Fig. 8D		Fig. 8E
	Firing frequency (Hz)			Firing frequency (Hz)			mAHP (mV)		Firing frequency (Hz)
	n	Mean	SEM	n	Mean	SEM	Mean	SEM	Mean	SEM
WT	11	32.876	1.957	60	69.133	1.304	8.520	0.255	68.967	1.510
KO	9	19.300	1.121	43	61.860	2.361	10.882	0.344	59.146	2.411
WT + CPA	11	24.538	2.099	17	57.588	4.168	10.762	0.669	62.909	3.312
KO + CPA	9	18.472	1.318	13	60.846	4.578	11.452	0.544	57.143	4.479

	One-way ANOVA		Two-way RM ANOVA
	F	p	F	p	F	p	F	p
Statistics
WT vs KO	14.338	<0.001	7.221	0.008	28.11	<0.001	11.367	0.001
WT vs WT + CPA			12.021	<0.001	12.619	<0.001	5.491	0.022
WT vs KO + CPA			8.939	0.004	21.503	<0.001	6.519	0.013
KO vs WT + CPA			0.81	0.372	0.00163	0.968	0.109	0.743
KO vs KO + CPA			0.51	0.478	1.25	0.269	0.0199	0.888
WT + CPA vs KO + CPA			0.00749	0.932	0.734	0.399	0.154	0.698
p value (post hoc Tukey's test)
WT vs KO		<0.001		0.002		<0.001		<0.001
WT vs WT + CPA		0.007		<0.001		<0.001		0.007
WT vs KO + CPA		<0.001		0.005		<0.001		0.003
KO vs WT + CPA		0.177		0.276		0.848
KO vs KO + CPA		0.989		0.631		0.373
WT + CPA vs KO + CPA		0.092		0.683		0.400

First row, Mean and SEM values of bar graphs in each panel; second row, F and p values of each pair after ANOVA, but the values after one-way ANOVA were comparisons of the whole group; third row, p values of bar graphs in each panel after post hoc Tukey's test.