Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1090–1101. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2619-16.2016

Table 4.

Relationship between gray matter density and flumazenil BPNDa

Region Gray matter
WLS regression
Volume (mm3) BPND GM density T p
Anterior inferior parietal sulcus 2406 3.08 0.45 2.98b 0.007b
Parietal lobule PF 3385 3.94 0.61 1.68 0.107
V3V 2865 3.42 0.52 1.60 0.123
Laterobasal amygdale 1301 2.42 0.67 2.05 0.052
Hippocampus cornu ammonis 2955 2.69 0.70 2.88b 0.008b
Hippocampus subiculum L 2505 2.67 0.72 1.63 0.116
Hippocampus subiculum R 2509 2.84 0.69 1.81 0.084

aRelationship between gray matter density and flumazenil BPND in regions showing a significant relationship in the Duncan et al. (2013) study. This table replicates the weighted least square (WLS) regression analysis done in Duncan et al. (2013) to investigate the relationship between gray matter density and flumazenil BPND in our healthy control group (N = 25), in regions from the Jülich histological atlas.

bSignificant with cluster-level correction across the whole brain at p < 0.05.