Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;35(13):2251–2257. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty961

Table 5.

Novel significant loci identified by the proposed joint test methods

SNP Chr Gene OT ET AT minP-2010 minP-2013
rs6730449 2 DYNC2LI1 5.75 e-07 1.72 e-08 3.72 e-08 1.83 e-07 2.43 e-06
rs762861 4 HGFAC 1.52 e-07 2.74 e-08 4.72 e-08 9.15 e-07 5.04 e-07
rs7705104 5 PELO 2.38 e-08 9.07 e-01 5.12 e-08 1.72 e-02
rs10462958 5 TIMD4 7.02 e-07 2.99 e-08 6.42 e-08 2.03 e-07
rs499921 6 FRK 4.99 e-07 2.70 e-08 5.80 e-08 1.81 e-07 5.07 e-08
rs12667186 7 SP4 9.69 e-07 3.14 e-08 6.75 e-08 1.36 e-07 1.08 e-07
rs17148062 7 POT1 4.66 e-08 7.65 e-01 9.98 e-08 6.14 e-02
rs4455806 8 SOX17 1.29 e-06 4.60 e-08 9.85 e-08 1.84 e-07 5.09 e-08
rs10090964 8 SDCBP 5.78 e-07 2.98 e-08 6.40 e-08 5.09 e-08 7.37 e-08
rs4573621 10 GPAM 4.54 e-08 4.14 e-02 9.72 e-08 2.70 e-04 2.09 e-04
rs4238103 12 LARP4 4.08 e-09 9.05 e-02 4.08 e-09 3.83 e-04
rs9600211 13 KLF12 1.57 e-09 1.88 e-01 1.57 e-09 1.52 e-05
rs4419034 15 FRMD5 4.87 e-08 4.30 e-01 1.04 e-07 5.05 e-08 1.51 e-06
rs16959082 17 RCVRN 3.67 e-08 5.32 e-02 7.87 e-08 7.44 e-05 4.32 e-01

Note: Listed are the joint test P-values and the minimum marginal test P-values across all traits in Teslovich et al. (2010) and Willer et al. (2013) (denoted as minP-2010 and minP-2013 respectively).