Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2019 Apr 5;73:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008

Table 1.

Frequencies, Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations among Sexting, Traditional Bullying Victimization, and Cyberbullying Victimization

Frequency (%) Scale range Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. SextingT2 592 (63.9%) 0–3 1.14 1.13 -
2. Sexting T3 435 (49.7%) 0–3 .86 1.06 .55** -
3. Sexting T4 336 (44.0%) 0–3 .81 1.07 35** .47** -
4. TBV T2 301 (31.3%) 1–4 1.44 .74 1 1** 11** .09* -
5. TBV T3 229 (25.8%) 1–4 1.35 .66 .08* .10** .08* .45** -
6. TBV T4 184 (24.1%) 1–4 1.32 .64 .06 13** 11** 43** 47** -
7. CBV T2 232 (24.1%) 0–2 .36 .68 .25** 14** .08* .31** .25** 22** -
8. CBV T3 184 (20.7%) 0–2 .30 .63 .20** .17** .16** 19** 34** .28** .33** -
9. CBV T4 94 (12.3%) 0–2 .17 .49 17** .13** .16** .20** 21** .32** .25** .36**

Note.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

TBV = traditional bullying victimization, CBV = cyber bullying victimization. Frequency of sexting is the number of participants who have experienced at least one type of sexting in the past year. Frequency of traditional bullying victimization is the number of participants who reported having “never” been bullied in the past 12 months. Frequency of cyber bullying victimization is the number of participants who have experienced at least one type of cyber bullying in the past year.